达达主义“反艺术”实践的媒介学分析  

Hand,Mediation of Technology and Expropriation of Things:A Médiologie Analysis of Dada s Anti-Art Practice

作　　者：陈青文 李延 Chen Qingwen;Li Yan

机构地区：[1]同济大学艺术与传媒学院

出　　处：《媒介批评》2023年第1期130-149,共20页Media Criticism

摘　　要：本文从法国学者德布雷的媒介学视角,分析达达主义“反艺术”(anti-art)实践的反对目标、实践路径;并通过德布雷对图像发展史的阐释,试图分析达达主义的“反艺术”实践落下帷幕消退的可能原因。文中指出达达主义的“反艺术”实践是通过将技术中介化的方式传递信息,反对固有思想和美学对艺术创作自由的压制,并强调外在化合物的征用。然而,从“图像和语词”关系上看,其作品在强烈的思想意图表达下,更偏向“可读的”词语,弱化了“可见的”图像特性与艺术作品所需的“可留存纪念物”;再从“偶像—艺术—视像”的图像演变体系来看,达达主义的“反艺术”实践并未颠覆图像与人之间传统的联系方式,也因此难以挣脱固有艺术体系的限制。From the perspective of médiologie by the French scholar Régis Debray,this paper discusses the goals and practical paths of the opposition to the“anti-art”practice of Dadaism,and attempts to analyze the reasons for the end of its“anti-art”practice through Debray s view of the history of image.The“anti-art”practice conveyed information through the mediation of technology,opposes the suppression of creative freedom by inherent thought and aesthetics,and emphasizes the externalization and expropriation of things,However,from the perspective of the relationship between“image and word”proposed by Debray,some representative works of Dadaism seem to be more inclined to“readable”words under their conceptual appeals,weakening the“visible”characteristics and the“retainable monuments”required by works of art.From the perspective of the image evolution system of“idol-art-visual”,the“anti-art”practice of Dadaism still stays in the regime of art after the regime of idol,and does not subvert the traditional relationship between images and people,so it is difficult to break free from the inherent limitations of the art regime.

关 键 词：媒介学 图像 达达主义 反艺术 技术中介化 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]