宅基地及地上建筑物强制执行的制度困局与破解之维——基于裁判分歧的展开与分析  

The Institutional Dilemma and Solution to the Compulsory Enforcement of Homestead and Ancillary Buildings Based on the Dissension of Judgements and Analysis

作　　者：庞琳 Pang Lin

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学人工智能法学院 [2]西南政法大学智能司法重庆市2011协同创新中心

出　　处：《中国不动产法研究》2023年第1期36-49,共14页Research on Real Estate Law of China

基　　金：2021年度教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“民法典民族性表达与制度供给研究”(21JZD033)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：宅基地及地上建筑物的执行问题在理论与实务中一直有所争议,现行司法裁判无法解答宅基地执行中的土地流转问题,宅基地的土地利用成为破解可执行性问题的关键。然而,宅基地及地上建筑物承载着复杂的权利形态,因此,有必要根据不同情形进行类型化区分,采取相应的执行措施。具体而言,基于宅基地价值差异,价值较高者可通过拍卖的价格性竞争实现价值最大化,价值较低者可采用变卖、以物抵债或租赁的方式。基于买受主体身份差异,集体内部未申请宅基地的成员优先于已经依申请取得宅基地的村民或者城镇居民。基于宅基地共有状态的差异,不动产整体处置后保留其他共有人的财产权益份额,同时也可启动强制管理措施,用管理收益抵偿被执行人的债务。The theory and practice of the implementation of homestead and ancillary buildings have always been controversial,and the current judicial decisions cannot solve the land circulation problem in the implementation of homestead,so the land use of homestead has become the key to breaking the enforceability.However,homestead and ancillary buildings bear complex rights,so it is necessary to classify them according to different situations and take corresponding enforcement measures.Specifically,based on the difference of homestead value,those with higher value can maximize the value through price competition of auction,while those with lower value can sell,pay debts with goods or lease.Based on the identity difference of buyers,the members of the collective who have not applied for homestead have priority over the villagers or urban residents who have obtained homestead according to the application.Based on the difference of the common ownership status of the homestead,the property rights and interests of other co-owners are retained after the overall disposal of the real estate.At the same time,compulsory management measures can also be initiated to offset the debt of the person subjected to enforcement with management income.

关 键 词：宅基地 强制执行 强制管理 

分 类 号：D922.32[政治法律—法学] D923.2