高校突发公共卫生事件应对能力评价指标体系构建  

Construction of an evaluation index system for the response capacity of universities to public health emergencies

作　　者：李志杰 杜国平 李小杉 刘洋阳 李睿 王亚青 陈笑艳 卫平民[1] LI Zhi-jie;DU Guoping;LI Xiaoshan;LIU Yangyang;LI Rui;WANG Yaqing;CHEN Xiaoyan;WEI Pingmin(School of Public Health,Southeast University,Nanjing(211189),China;不详)

机构地区：[1]东南大学公共卫生学院,江苏南京211189 [2]东南大学医院全科医学科 [3]南京医科大学附属无锡人民医院肺移植中心

出　　处：《中国学校卫生》2023年第9期1418-1422,共5页Chinese Journal of School Health

基　　金：江苏省教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度重点课题(T-a/2021/01);江苏省“十四五”高等教育科学研究规划重点调研课题(ZDDY12)。

摘　　要：目的构建高校突发公共卫生事件应对能力评价指标体系,为进一步提升高校公共卫生事件应对能力提供依据。方法于2019年11月,在文献研究和专家讨论基础上制定评价体系,选择15名专家通过层次分析法进行主观评价,调查120所江苏省高校,通过反熵权法进行客观评价,以主客观联合赋权法进行最终评价。结果指标体系由4个一级指标、9个二级指标、32个三级指标以及67个四级指标构成。组合赋权法分析显示,一级指标权重从大到小依次为事件处置能力(0.666)、事件发现能力(0.203)、事前准备能力(0.101)和事后恢复能力(0.031)。二级指标权重前三位为应急响应(0.480)、监测与报告(0.203)和指挥协调(0.151)。一致性指标评价结果显示,专家权威系数为0.909,Kendall’s W协调系数为0.836(P<0.01),一致性比例值均<0.1。结论研究构建的评价体系有较高的科学性和可信性,对于评价高校突发公共卫生事件应对能力提供了依据。Objective To construct an evaluation index system to assess the response capacity of universities to public health e-mergencies,so as to provide a basis for improvements the response capacity.Methods In November 2019,in order to develop an evaluation system based on literature review and expert discussions,15 experts were invited to conduct a subjective evaluation used hierarchical analysis.The objective evaluation was conducted in 120 universities in Jiangsu Province used the inverse entropy weigh-ting method,and the final evaluation employed the joint subjective and objective weighting method.Results The indicator system consisted of four primary indicators,nine secondary indicators,32 tertiary indicators and 67 quaternary indicators.The analysis of the combined weighting method showed that the primary indicators,in descending order,included incident handling capability(0.666),incident detection capability(0.203),prior preparation capability(0.101)and post-event recovery capability(0.031).The top three secondary indicator weights were emergency response(0.480),monitoring and reporting(0.203)and command and coordination(0.151).The results of the evaluation of the consistency indicators showed that the expert authority coefficient was 0.909 and the Kendall's W coordination coefficient was 0.836(P<0.01),with all consistency scale values<0.1.Conclusion The evaluation system is highly scientific and credible,and provides basis for evaluating the response capability of universities to public health emergencies.

关 键 词：公共卫生 层次分析 专家委员会 学生保健服务 

分 类 号：G478[文化科学—教育学] R195[文化科学—教育技术学]