行政滥用职权司法审查标准的反思与完善  

Definition of Abuse of Power in Administrative Litigation

作　　者：邢益精[1] 杨宏韬 Xing Yijing;Yang Hongtao

机构地区：[1]浙江理工大学法政学院

出　　处：《行政与法》2023年第10期66-76,共11页Administration and Law

摘　　要：滥用职权作为行政行为撤销的重要根据之一,历来饱受争议。由于立法上对滥用职权的概念没有作出权威解释,学界对滥用职权标准的界分也尚无统一定论,导致审判领域对滥用职权的适用不尽如人意,泛化适用或规避使用的情形时有发生。在新行政诉讼法体系下,采用主观、客观、职权三要件相结合的标准对滥用职权进行认定,将在一定程度上提升滥用职权标准的可适用性,优化法院对行政裁量的司法控制,并为行政诉讼司法审查体系的理论完善发挥建设性作用。在涉及滥用职权和明显不当这一组概念的界分时,可以采用实质和形式分离的方法对行政行为进行审查认定,提升行政诉讼的裁判质量。Abuse of power,as one of the important bases for the revocation of administrative acts,has always been controversial.Because there is no authoritative interpretation of the concept of abuse of power in the legislation,and there is no unified conclusion on the distinction between abuse of power and other standards in the academic field,the application of abuse of power in the judicial field is not always satisfactory,and the situation of generalized application or evasion of use often occurs.Under the new administrative procedure law system,the identification of abuse of power by adopting the criteria of combining the three elements of subjective,objective and authority will improve the applicability of the standard of abuse of power to a certain extent,optimize the judicial control of the court over administrative discretion,and play a constructive role in the theoretical improvement of the judicial review system of administrative litigation.When it comes to the demarcation of the concepts of abuse of power and obvious misconduct,the method of separating substance and form can be used to review and identify administrative acts,so as to improve the judgment quality of administrative litigation.

关 键 词：滥用职权 行政诉讼 实质形式分离 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]