检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晓洁 LI Xiaojie(School of Marxism,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100105,China)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学马克思主义学院,北京100105
出 处:《中国医学伦理学》2023年第10期1074-1078,共5页Chinese Medical Ethics
基 金:对外经济贸易大学青年教师发展研究项目“高等教育中的人工智能:伦理风险和治理研究”。
摘 要:ChatGPT代表着奇点的临近,既为医学伦理教育带来了机遇,也可能会受制于技术逻辑而导致不公平、歧视、自主性丧失等问题。探讨了医学伦理教育中以生成式人工智能技术为中介关系模式,进而分析技术作为人的创造物,可能产生正面和负面的价值,以及ChatGPT给医学伦理教育带来的挑战。基于此,从以下四个方面提出建议:一是基于师生关系的改变探讨不同责任主体的角色划分与建构,二是应培育学生敢于思考和质疑的能力,三是基于智能教育未来发展探讨前瞻责任,四是从技术逻辑的视角预设人机双主体共存的情形。ChatGPT represents the approaching singularity,which brings opportunity to medical ethics education,but is also constrained by issues such as unfairness,discrimination,and loss of autonomy caused by technological logic.This paper explored the intermediary relationship model of generative AI in medical ethics education,and analyzed the potential positive and negative values of this technology as a human creation,as well as the challenges that ChatGPT brings to medical ethics education.Based on this,suggestions are put for ward from the following four aspects.First,The role division and construction of different responsible subjects was explored based on the change in teacher-student relationship.Second,we shonld cultivate students ability to think and question.Third,the forward-looking responsibility was discussed based on the future development of intelligent education.Fourthly,from the perspective of technical logic,it presupposes the coexistence of human-machine dual subjects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222