革命与学术:钱亦石与郭沫若的交往及其史学异同离合  

Between Revolution and Academy:Qian Yishi and Guo Moruo in Chinese Historiography

作　　者：唐勇 Tang Yong

机构地区：[1]山东大学儒学高等研究院,250100

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2023年第5期60-71,158,共13页Historiography Bimonthly

摘　　要：钱亦石与郭沫若相识于北伐战争;大革命失败后,二人皆亡命日本,私谊日渐密切;1937年日军全面侵华之际,二人以“书生报国”之志共赴国难。除了革命交谊,他们在史学上也有紧密的关联。钱亦石的《中国政治史讲话》与郭沫若的《中国古代社会研究》在很大程度上存在交叠之处,具有明显的“互文性”;在史学关系上呈现继承与批判双重性,这主要表现在他对郭著的研究方法、理论框架和卜辞铭文考释多有因承,而在具体的中国社会历史问题上,又往往持批评之见、歧异大于认同。廓清钱、郭二人的史学异同离合,对理解中国早期马克思主义史家群体的史学连续性和异质性有深远意义。Qian Yishi and Guo Moruo met during the Northern Expedition.After the failure of the Great Revolution,both of them fled to Japan,and there they became close friends gradually.In 1937,when the Japanese army launched a full-scale invasion of China,the two returned to China in the face of the"national calamity"with an ambition of"serving the country as scholars".In addition to their friendship in revolution,Qian and Guo also shared similar interests in historical research.In particular,there were many overlaps between Qian's Lectures on Chinese Political History and Guo Moruo's A Study of Ancient Chinese Society.Also,there existed obvious"intertextuality".Not only did they learn from each other but also criticized each other.For example,Qian learned a great deal from Guo's research methods,theoretical framework and interpretations on scripts and inscriptions.Yet they also criticized each other especially on the detailed issues in the social history of China where their differences were greater than their agreements.It is of far-reaching significance to understand the historical continuity and heterogeneity of early Chinese Marxist historians by identifying the similarities and differences in historiography between Qian and Guo.

关 键 词：钱亦石 郭沫若 《中国古代社会研究》 《中国政治史讲话》 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]