检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尹惠敏[1] 李荣宽[1] YIN Huimin;LI Rongkuan(Department of Infectious Disease,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian,Liaoning 116023,China)
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学附属第二医院感染科,辽宁大连116023
出 处:《临床肝胆病杂志》2023年第10期2288-2293,共6页Journal of Clinical Hepatology
摘 要:慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)发病机制复杂,临床治疗困难,预后差。由于不同国家地区慢性肝病分布的不同,在过去的几十年中,有超过十种ACLF评分及分型标准被提出,表明ACLF在定义、评分及分型方面存在较大分歧。通过梳理具有广泛影响的几种评分及分型的特点,探讨其演变进程及适用于我国的分型标准,为优化治疗方案提供参考。Acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)has complex pathogeneses,difficulties in clinical treatment,and poor prognosis.Due to the differences in the distribution of chronic liver diseases in different countries and regions,more than ten scoring and classification systems for ACLF have been proposed in the past few decades,indicating that there are great differences in the definition,scoring,and classification of ACLF.By analyzing the characteristics of several widely used scoring and classification systems,this article discusses their evolution process and the classification criteria applicable to China,so as to provide a reference for optimizing treatment regimens.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15