黑格尔《逻辑学》再审视——构造方式、“三论”要害与历史关涉  

A Re-examination of Hegel's The Science of Logic:Way of Formation,Crucial Points of Three "Doctrines"and Historical Relevance

作　　者：庄振华[1] ZHUANG Zhenhua

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学马克思主义学部暨哲学学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2023年第10期36-47,101,共13页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“黑格尔逻辑学视域下现代理性的自我调适研究”(项目编号:20BZX090)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《逻辑学》是黑格尔全部哲学的根基与指南,也是打开西方文化内核的一把钥匙。然而其严密精巧的架构与层层推进的义理,以及后世基于学派立场而对其产生的先入之见,在客观上都不利于读者把握其超越学派乃至超越历史的意义。就构造方式而言,理解《逻辑学》必须具备几个基本条件,即掌握辩证理性与思辨理性的区别,过渡、映现与发展的特质,以及“一元”“二元”与“三元”的内涵。只有在此基础上才能抓住该书的构造方式与阅读之法。就“三论”(存在论、本质论、概念论)要害而言,“现象”与“本质性对比关系”两章是辐射与破解“三论”的关键点。就历史关涉而言,黑格尔之前的哲学传统在该书中的沉淀方式是以(广义)现代科学的方式被重塑,并服务于“接纳但穿透”现代性这一任务。该书与后世欧美和中国思想的多重关涉,乃至中国学者的思想使命,也都可以从这一视角来考察。The Science of Logic is the foundation and guidebook of Hegel's whole philosophy and a key to Western culture.However,because of its rigorous and ingenious formation and tier upon tier of its argumentation tier upon tier,and also because of preconception from various schools in later ages,it is difficult to grasp its schooltranscending and even history-exceeding meaning.There are some basic prerequisites to understanding this book,namely grasping the differences between dialectical and speculative Reason,the characteristics of transition,reflection and development,and the implications of unitary,binary and ternary structures.Only on the basis of these prerequisites could we master the way of its formation and the method of reading it.The two chapters respectively entitled"Appearance"and"The Essential Relation"could serve as crucial points of deciphering the doctrines of being,essence and concept.The philosophical tradition before Hegel crystallizes in this book in the following ways,namely being remolded by way of modern science(in its broader sense)and serving the task of"admiting but penetrating"modernity.The multiple relations between this book and the subsequent European,American and Chinese thoughts,and even the task of Chinese scholars,could all be examined from this perspective.

关 键 词：黑格尔 《逻辑学》 本质论 二元设定 

分 类 号：B516.35[哲学宗教—外国哲学]