重思弗朗西斯·培根的三联画——结构人类学与德勒兹的“第三条路”  

Rethinking Francis Bacon's Triptych:Structural Anthropology and Deleuze's"Third Way"

作　　者：周厚翼 ZHOU Houyi(School of Philosophy,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433

出　　处：《文化艺术研究》2023年第5期39-49,113,共12页Studies in Culture and Art

摘　　要：英国画家弗朗西斯·培根主张绘画必须把形象从形象化那里剥离出来,试图以“三联画”的形式构建一种“形象”,回避“图解性”和“叙事性”这两个方向,直面绘画现实本身,从而实现“形象”的解放。在《弗朗西斯·培根:感觉的逻辑》一书中,吉尔·德勒兹认为,培根走出了介于“抽象”与“具象”之间的“第三条路”,却并未指出“第三条路”的所示结构。克洛德·列维-斯特劳斯的结构人类学通过考察美洲族群部落的组织结构与社会关系,揭示了一种“三联体”的思路何以皲裂“二元现象”,进而提供了一种理解培根绘画的全新视角。British painter Francis Bacon advocated for the separation of the image from representation in painting.He attempted to create a new"image"through the triptych,thereby avoiding"illustration"and"narration",confronting the reality of painting,and achieving the liberation of the image.In Francis Bacon,logique de la sensation,Gilles Deleuze argued that Bacon ventured onto a"third way"between"abstraction"and"figuration"yet did not provide a detailed explanation of this"third way".Claude Lévi-Strauss'structural anthropology,which examined the organization and social relationships within American tribal communities,revealed a triadic perspective that challenged dualism.This perspective offers a fresh angle for understanding Bacon's painting.

关 键 词：弗朗西斯·培根 三联画 德勒兹 结构人类学 列维-斯特劳斯 

分 类 号：J02[艺术—艺术理论]