检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑金坡 田羿 柳俊杰 马雷 孙维师 张琪 郭思柔 张少谦 ZHENG Jin-po;TIAN Yi;LIU Jun-jie;MA Lei;SUN Wei-shuai;ZHANG Qi;GUO Si-rou;ZHANG Shao-qian(Cancer Hospital,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
出 处:《现代医院管理》2023年第5期73-75,共3页Modern Hospital Management
基 金:天津医科大学2020年度医院管理创新项目“医疗机构视角下DRG付费实施路径及管理策略研究”(2020YG11)。
摘 要:目的分析GHS-DRG付费模式下某肿瘤专科医院入组恶性增生性疾患的靶向、免疫治疗(RG1)组的数据,探讨该组权重的合理性以及国家谈判药的医保支付问题。方法对2021年11月至2022年3月入组到RG1组病例数据进行描述性分析。结果按DRG付费对比项目付费,RG1组5个月减收278.50万元;住院费用中主要为药品费,占比达73.8%。结论RG1组按照当前权重医疗机构减收较多,各DRG组权重应建立动态调整机制。支付方式改革,要充分考虑国家谈判药的影响,国家谈判药品应单独进行支付,确保国家谈判药品政策落地实施。Objective:To analyze the targeted and immunotherapy(RG1)group data of malignant proliferative diseases enrolled in a certain tumor specialized hospital under the GHS-DRG payment model,explore the rationality of the weight of this group,and discuss the issue of medical insurance payment for national negotiated drugs.Method:A descriptive analysis was conducted on the data of cases enrolled in the RG1 group from November 2021 to March 2022.Result:According to the DRG payment comparison project,RG1 group received a 5-month reduction of 2.785 million yuan;The main cost of hospitalization is drug expenses,accounting for 73.8%.Conclusion:According to the current weight,medical institutions in RG1 group have significantly reduced their income,and dynamic adjustment mechanisms should be established for the weights of each DRG group.The reform of payment methods should fully consider the impact of national negotiated drugs,which should be paid separately to ensure the implementation of national negotiated drug policies.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229