真理是终极的认知价值吗?——基于一元论与多元论价值图景的比较  

Is Truth the Ultimate Epistemic Value?:A Comparison of Veritism and Pluralism Value Perspectives

作　　者：林玉玲 郑伟平[1] LIN Yu-ling;ZHENG Wei-ping(Department of Philosophy,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学系,厦门361005

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2023年第8期42-49,共8页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：福建省哲学社会科学学科基础理论研究基地重大项目“当代中国马克思主义知识论的构建研究”(FJ2021MJDZ005)。

摘　　要：真理是终极的认知价值吗?对此,认知价值一元论主张,真理是思想体系的终极价值和认知的首要目标,知识、理解等其他认知目标的价值可还原为真之价值;多元论则认为广义知识论视阈下,真理与其他认知成功地位平等。为多元论辩护的传统主流路径诉诸认知目标的多样性以反证认知价值的独立性,但这一路径未能充分考虑基本与非基本认知价值之间的区别,无法构成对一元论的有效批驳。然而,通过分析真理所具有的与人类认知和价值体系相关的特性,可以发现真值一元论的核心立场,即“真理是唯一内在的认知价值”,是自我反驳的。从一元到多元价值的驱动,是当代知识论深刻变革的基本趋势之一。Is truth the ultimate epistemic value?Veritists advocate that truth is the ultimate value in the thought system and the primary epistemic goal so that other epistemic values such as knowledge and understanding can be reduced to the value of truth.Pluralists,on the other hand,argue that from a broad epistemological perspective,truth stands on an equal footing with other epistemic success.The mainstream path to defending Pluralism appeals to the diversity of epistemic goals to demonstrate the independence of epistemic values.However,this approach fails to adequately consider the distinction between fundamental and non-fundamental epistemic values,thus rendering it ineffective against Veritism.Nevertheless,by rethinking the characteristics of truth in relation to human cognition and value systems,it can be found that the core idea of Veritism that“truth is the only intrinsic epistemic value”is self-refuting.On the subject of epistemic value,there is a shift from Monism to Pluralism,which is one of the fundamental trends in the profound transformation of contemporary epistemology.

关 键 词：认知价值 认知目标 真理 真值一元论 多元论 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]