检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许新意 岳婧婧 高玲[2] 曾禹沙 李婧婧 冯克[2] 薛雅红[3] Xu Xinyi;Yue Jingjing;Gao Ling;Zeng Yusha;Li Jingjing;Feng Ke;Xue Yahong(Graduate School,Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210023,China;Department of Anorectal Diseases,Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210001,China;Department of Imaging,Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine,Nanjing 210001,China)
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学研究生院,210023 [2]南京中医药大学附属南京中医院影像科,210001 [3]南京中医药大学附属南京中医院肛肠科,210001
出 处:《中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版)》2023年第5期342-348,共7页Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition)
基 金:江苏省中医肛肠疾病临床医学创新中心项目(GCCXZX-2021)。
摘 要:目的以X线排粪造影为金标准,探讨经会阴超声、MRI排粪造影两种影像学技术对女性出口梗阻型便秘的临床诊断价值。方法选取2020年1月至2021年12月于南京市中医院肛肠科就诊,临床诊断为出口梗阻型便秘的女性患者41例,同时进行X线排粪造影、经会阴超声、MRI排粪造影三种影像学检查。以X线排粪造影为参考标准,评价经会阴超声和MRI排粪造影对直肠前突、会阴下降、直肠黏膜内套叠、肠疝、盆底痉挛诊断的敏感度和特异度,并对三种影像学的诊断结果进行一致性检验。结果以X线排粪造影为参考标准,经会阴超声诊断直肠黏膜内套叠、直肠前突、会阴下降、肠疝、盆底痉挛的敏感性分别为94.12%、87.5%、55.56%、80%、100%,特异性为100%、88.89%、100%、100%、93.33%;MRI排粪造影敏感性分别为70.59%、81.25%、55.56%、60%、63.64%,特异性分别为100%、77.78%、75%、100%、96.67%。经会阴超声在诊断直肠前突、会阴下降方面与X线一致性较高,Kappa系数分别为0.682、0.661;在诊断直肠黏膜内套叠、肠疝、盆底痉挛方面与X线一致性很好,Kappa系数分别为0.845、0.875、0.883。MRI排粪造影在诊断肠疝、盆底痉挛方面与X线一致性较高,Kappa系数分别为0.725、0.660。结论经会阴超声可以作为女性出口梗阻型便秘的初步评估技术;MRI排粪造影可以作为此类患者病因诊断的有效补充。Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic value of transperineal ultrasound(TPUS)and MR defecography(MRD)in female outlet obstruction constipation(OOC)by using X-ray defecography(XRD)as the gold standard.Methods From January 2020 to December 2021,41 female patients who were clinically diagnosed as OOC in the Department of Anorectal Diseases of Nanjing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were selected for XRD,TPUS and MRD.With XRD as the reference standard,the sensitivity and specificity of TPUS and MRD in the diagnosis of rectocele,perineal descent,rectal intussusception,enterocele and pelvic floor dyssynergia were evaluated,and the consistency of the three imaging results was tested.Results Taking XRD as the reference standard,the sensitivity of TPUS in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception,rectocele,perineal descent,enterocele,and pelvic floor dyssynergia was 94.12%,87.5%,55.56%,80%,and 100%,and the specificity was 100%,88.89%,100%,100%,and 93.33%.The sensitivity of MRD in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception,rectocele,perineal descent,enterocele and pelvic floor dyssynergia was 70.59%,81.25%,55.5%,60%and 63.64%,and the specificity was 100%,77.78%,75%,100%and 96.67%.TPUS was highly consistent with XRD in the diagnosis of rectocele and perineal descent,and the Kappa coefficients were 0.682 and 0.661.TPUS has good consistency with XRD in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception,enterocele,pelvic floor dyssynergia,and the Kappa coefficients were 0.845,0.875,0.883.MRD was highly consistent with XRD in the diagnosis of enterocele and pelvic floor dyssynergia,and the Kappa coefficients were 0.725 and 0.660.Conclusion TPUS can be used as a preliminary evaluation technique for female OOC;MRD can be used as an effective supplement to the etiological diagnosis of such patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94