检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屈金照 张丽华[1] 徐世勇[1] QU Jinzhao;ZHANG Lihua;XU Shiyong(School of Labor and Human Resources,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2023年第9期165-182,共18页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
摘 要:文章基于相对剥夺理论,通过分析251套、三个时间点的配对数据,探讨了领导谦卑对员工越轨创新行为的影响机制,以及员工资质过剩感在二者间的中介作用和主动性人格的调节作用。结果发现:领导谦卑正向影响员工的资质过剩感,进而正向影响其越轨创新行为;员工的主动性人格负向调节了领导谦卑与员工资质过剩感间的关系,同时也负向调节了员工资质过剩感对领导谦卑和员工越轨创新行为的中介作用。To explain the bottom-up innovation processes in organizations,more and more research is turning to the study of bootlegging innovation behavior.Although previous research has found that leader humility is an important factor influencing employee in-role and out-role behaviors,little is known about how and when leader humility inspires employee bootlegging innovation behavior from an emotional processing mechanism.Specifically,based on the relative deprivation theory,this research proposes and tests a moderated mediation model suggesting that leader humility can inspire employee over-qualification,which is proposed to mediate the relationship,for employee bootlegging.Furthermore,employee proactive personality can determine the strength of the direct effect of leader humility on bootlegging and indirect mediating effect of leader humility on bootlegging via over-qualification.To test our theatrical model,this study recruited 300 participants from eight Chinese companies focused on research and development innovation activities located in Beijing,Hebei,and Shandong provinces.To reduce the common method variance bias,we conducted a three-wave survey.For round 1,employees were given the questionnaire with measurements of leader humility,employee proactive personality,and employee demographic variables.One month later,for round 2,participants who accomplished the investigation at round 1 were invited to fill out another questionnaire that measured employee perceived over-qualification.Another month later,for round 3,participants who accomplished the questionnaire at round 2 were invited to fill out the third survey to assess their bootlegging.After removing the incomplete and unmatched answers,the final sample consisted of 251 participants.Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to confirm the discriminant validity of the core variables involved in this study.Harman's(1960)single-factor test was then used to test the common method variance bias.Furthermore,SPSS 23.0 was used to test the above Hypotheses.To obtain
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15