信息网络犯罪地判断规则再认识  

Re-recognizing Judgment Rules of Place of Information Cybercrime

作　　者：奚哲涵 Xi Zhehan(School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2023年第6期134-145,共12页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

摘　　要：“犯罪地”的确定是刑事诉讼地域管辖制度的核心。随着我国犯罪类型的急剧变化,对“犯罪地”的解释已呈宽松、扩张之势,判断传统案件“犯罪地”的规则在针对信息网络犯罪案件之时已有不适之处,服务器所在地、被害人被侵害地作为管辖连结点已经无法适应信息网络犯罪所呈现的新样态。限制并案管辖的延伸空间以及平衡侦查管辖与审判管辖之间的关系是重中之重。在诉讼中“犯罪地”不是静态、恒定的,证据变化会导致原有的管辖连结点丧失或改变,因此需要建立动态判断规则并对程序效力加以明晰,同时完善相配套的指定管辖制度。The determination of“place of crime”is the core of the regional jurisdiction system of criminal procedure.With the sharp change of crime types in China,the interpretation of“place of crime”has shown a loose and expanded trend,and the rules for judging the“place of crime”of traditional cases have become unsuitable in information cybercrime cases.The location of the server and the place where the victim was infringed as the jurisdiction link point have been unable to adapt to the new pattern of information network crime.At the same time,it is also of paramount importance to limit the extension space of combined jurisdiction and balance the relationship between investigation jurisdiction and trial jurisdiction.In litigation,the“place of crime”is not static and constant,so the change of evidence will lead to the loss or change of the original jurisdiction link point.Therefore,it is necessary to establish dynamic judgment rules,clarify the effectiveness of the procedure,and at the same time improve the supporting designated jurisdiction system.

关 键 词：信息网络犯罪 犯罪地 连结点 动态判断规则 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]