论刑事法官法庭调查程序中的介入权  

On the Right to Intervene in Court Investigation Procedure of Criminal Judges

作　　者：杨勇 YANG Yong

机构地区：[1]贵州财经大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2023年第5期57-64,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

基　　金：贵州省2022年哲学社会科学规划课题“减刑假释案件实质化审理的内在机理与程序再造研究”(22GZYB25)。

摘　　要：在刑事法庭调查过程中,由于庭审参与人法律知识欠缺、庭审经验不足、庭审诉求特殊等原因,常出现庭审活动偏离主题、庭审失序等现象。为查明案件事实、提升庭审效率、给予弱势方诉讼关照、彰显法官正义形象,法官应依职权行使庭审介入权。法官介入庭审调查程序的方式主要包括制止不当发言、介入式补充发问、处置异议等。法官庭审介入权既不能“缺位”,亦不可“越位”。其行使应以查明事实为中心,秉持平等对待控辩双方原则,把握必要限度,尽力促进实现程序公正与实体公正。In the investigation process of criminal court,due to the lack of legal knowledge of trial participants,lack of trial experience,special appeals and other reasons,court activities often deviate from the theme,court disorder and other phenomena.In order to find out the facts of the case,improve the efficiency of the trial,give the disadvantaged party litigation care,and highlight the justice image of the judge,the judge should exercise the right to intervene in the trial according to the authority.The ways in which a judge intervenes in the trial investigation procedure mainly include stopping improper speeches,intervening supplementary questions and handling objections.The judge's right to intervene in trial can neither be"absent"nor"offside".Its exercise should focus on finding out the facts,uphold the principle of equal treatment of both the prosecution and the defense,grasp the necessary limits,and try to promote the realization of procedural justice and substantive justice.

关 键 词：刑事法官 法庭调查 介入权 程序正义 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]