学术评价视域下单篇论文的学科定位研究  

Research on the Discipline Attributes of Literature from the Perspective of Academic Evaluation

作　　者：方胜宇 于曦[2] Fang Shengyu;Yu Xi(School of Information and Intelligence Engineering,Tianjin Renai College,Tianjin 301636,China;Library of Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津仁爱学院信息与智能工程学院,天津301636 [2]天津师范大学图书馆,天津300387

出　　处：《文献与数据学报》2023年第3期11-25,共15页Journal of Library and Data

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划(重点)项目“‘双一流’学科建设背景下全域学科分类映射理论与实践”(项目编号:TJTQ21-001)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]梳理学科分类的发展演变,分析比较CWTS、Citation Topics和Dimensions三个体系对单篇文献的主题定位,为学术评价中以单篇论文的研究主题进行学科定位提供参考。[方法/过程]分析比较三个体系的原理和构建方法,以某高校心理学院的科研论文为研究对象,对其在三个体系中的学科主题分类进行对比分析,并结合论文在WOS中的学科分类,分析论文所属学科主题。[结果/结论]三个分类体系各有优势和不足,CWTS主题分类粒度较细且提供动态图谱,Citation Topics方便进行主题文献的导出和进一步分析,Dimensions收录的文献来源和文献类型比较全面和广泛。CWTS在对主题的描述上要好于Citation Topics,Citation Topics对论文学科主题的定位不一定准确,Dimensions的主题定位粒度相对宽泛一些。对论文研究主题的学科定位需要结合多个学科分类体系,从论文内容、参考文献和施引文献等进行综合判断。[Purpose/significance]To sort out the development and evolution of disciplinary classification,analyze and compare the thematic positioning of individual literature using the CWTS,Citation Topics,and Dimensions systems,and provide reference for academic evaluation using the research topic of individual papers for disciplinary positioning.[Method/process]Analyze and compare the principles and construction methods of the three systems.Taking a research paper from a psychological college of a certain university as the research object,compare and analyze its subject topic classification in the three systems.Combined with the subject classification of the paper in WOS,analyze the subject theme of the paper.[Result/conclusion]Each of the three classification systems has its advantages and disadvantages.CWTS topic classification has a finer granularity and provides dynamic graphs.Citation Topics facilitate the export and further analysis of topic literature.The sources and types of literature included in Dimensions are relatively comprehensive and extensive.CWTS is better at describing topics than Citation Topics,as Citation Topics may not necessarily accurately position the subject topic of the paper.The granularity of topic positioning in Dimensions is relatively broad.The disciplinary positioning of the research topic of the paper needs to be combined with multiple disciplinary classification systems,and a comprehensive judgment should be made from the content,references,and cited literature of the paper.

关 键 词：学科属性 学科分类 主题定位 CWTS CITATION TOPICS Dimensions 

分 类 号：G254.2[文化科学—图书馆学]