检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张福安 李娜 达庆利[2] 王文宾[3] ZHANG Fu-an;LI Na;DA Qing-li;WANG Wen-bin(Information Engineering(Artificial Intelligence)School of Yangzhou University,Jiangsu Yangzhou 225000,China;Economics and Management School of Southeast University,Jiangsu Nanjing 210096,China;Economics and Management School of China University of Mining and Technology,Jiangsu Xuzhou 222116,China)
机构地区:[1]扬州大学信息工程(人工智能)学院,江苏扬州225000 [2]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210096 [3]中国矿业大学经济管理学院,江苏徐州222116
出 处:《中国管理科学》2023年第10期116-127,共12页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971210)。
摘 要:考虑消费者低碳偏好以及政府的补贴政策,基于“以旧换新”“以旧换再”共存的闭环供应链,构建了单一垄断制造商进行两阶段差异定价的决策模型,比较分析了不同补贴政策以及消费者低碳偏好对制造商减排决策、闭环供应链绩效以及环境效益的影响,并结合数值分析进行了验证。结果表明:政府补贴有助于降低制造商减排启动条件,而再制造产品的减排属性越差时,制造商低碳减排积极性越高;碳减排补贴使消费者低碳偏好对供应链环境效益的积极影响更加显著,而“以旧换再”补贴则更有利于制造商利用消费者低碳偏好在减排与再制造中获利;政府对制造商碳减排水平较高的供应链实施碳减排补贴,对制造商碳减排水平较低的供应链实施“以旧换再”补贴,有利于实现对碳排放的高效监管;当单位补贴较低时,“以旧换再”补贴使制造商对碳减排投入更高,而单位补贴额较高时,碳减排补贴使制造商对碳减排投入更高。The issue of global warming has aroused widespread concern all over the world.Governments and companies around the world are actively working hard to achieve low-carbon emission reduction.However,the company must invest in energy conservation and emission reduction for green production,which occupies the company's funds for production activities,resulting in low enthusiasm for carbon emission reduction.To this end,the government has introduced a variety of preferential policies to increase the enthusiasm of enterprises to carry out carbon emission reduction activities.Considering consumers’low-carbon preference and government subsidy policies,in the context of the coexistence of old-for-new and old-for-remanufacturing in the closed-loop supply chain,a single monopolistic manufacturer has constructed a two-stage differential pricing decision model.The effects of two government subsidies and consumer low-carbon preferences on manufacturer's emission reduction decisions,closed-loop supply chain performance and environmental benefits are analyzed,and the results of the study are simulated with numerical values.The results show that:Government subsidies help reduce the conditions for manufacturer to initiate emission reductions,and the worse the emission reduction properties of re-products,the higher the manufacturer’s enthusiasm for low-carbon emission reduction.Carbon emission reduction subsidy make the positive impact of consumers'low-carbon preferences on the environmental benefits of the supply chain more significant,while“trade-in”subsidy are more conducive for manufacturers to use consumers'low-carbon preferences to benefit from emission reduction and remanufacturing.The govern⁃ment implements carbon emission reduction subsidy for the manufacturer with higher levels of carbon emission reduction,and implements“trade-in”subsidy for the manufacturer with low levels of carbon emission reduc⁃tion,which is conducive to the realization of efficient carbon emission supervision.When the government unit s
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229