检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曲春红[1] 王晓玮 QU Chunhong;WANG Xiaowei
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学
出 处:《外语教学理论与实践》2023年第5期33-43,54,共12页Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
摘 要:本研究采用3(构词方式:非派生词、前缀派生词、后缀派生词)×2(语义相关性:相关、无关)×2(二语水平:中等水平、低水平)的多因素混合设计,通过在线语义判断任务考察英语派生词缀对于不同水平学习者词汇语义加工的影响。结果显示:1)英语派生词缀对于词汇语义通达有显著的干扰效应,前缀比后缀的干扰效应更显著。表明派生词语义加工过程存在词素分解过程。2)随着语言水平的提高,后缀的干扰效应明显减弱。但即使在中等水平阶段,前缀的影响依然显著。本研究结果对于英语形态复杂词的语义加工和习得研究有一定的启示作用。The research investigated the influences of English derivational affixes on EFLs' lexical access through an on-line semantic decision task.The manipulation of variables came to a 3(word formation:non-derivatives,prefixed derivatives,suffixed derivatives) × 2(semantic relatedness:semantically related,semantically unrelated) ×2(L2 proficiency:medium level proficiency,low proficiency).The result showed that 1) The affixes had significant inhibitory effects on the lexical access of derivatives,and the inhibition of prefixes was significantly higher than that of the suffixes,suggesting that the decomposition process might have occurred during the semantic processing;2) The inhibitory effects of suffixes grew weaker with the progress of L2 proficiency;nevertheless,the inhibition of prefixes were still very significant even for the medium level proficiency participants.The research result was aimed to provide more data and evidences for the research of semantic processing and acquisition of English words with complex morphological structures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7