检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭枫 GUO Feng(Research Institute of Foreign Languages,Beijing Foreign Studies University,Beijing 100089,China;College of ForeignLanguages and Cultures,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)
机构地区:[1]北京外国语大学 [2]厦门大学
出 处:《外文研究》2023年第4期1-9,102,共10页Foreign Studies
基 金:教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“金课建设目标下高校外语教师信息化教学能力的构建研究”(21YJC740047);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目“混合式教学背景下的高校外语‘金课’建设及教师专业学习共同体构建”(JSZW20002)。
摘 要:Langacker的认知语法是认知语言学范式的核心理论框架之一,自20世纪70年代中期发轫,便引发语言学界的关注,至今已取得了令人瞩目的研究成果。本文着力从理论和应用两个维度回顾认知语法在中国30年(1990—2020)的研究历程,归结其研究特点和主要研究议题,并反思目前尚存的研究不足。研究表明:国内认知语法理论思辨与应用探索并行向前推进,基于汉语语言事实的本体个案研究成果丰硕,但同时也存在理论思索不够深入及应用研究整体相对滞后等问题。Langackerian cognitive grammar(CG henceforth)is one of the most classic theoretical frameworks under the paradigm of cognitive linguistics.It has gained considerable attention and remarkable achievements in the linguistic academia since its first debut in the middle 1970s.This paper aims to review the thirty years(1990—2020)research history of CG in China and to summarize the general characteristics and the highlights of CG studies in both theory and application.Moreover,the research weaknesses are pointed out.It is shown that CG studies are moving progressively in term of both theoretical speculations and application explorations,and particularly the case studies on Chinese language issues are abundant.However,at the same time some research inadequacies have been exposed that the theoretical speculations are not insightful enough or the application explorations are still in the bud,etc.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38