机构地区:[1]北京大学人民医院、北京大学血液病研究所、国家血液系统疾病临床医学研究中心,北京100044
出 处:《中华内科杂志》2023年第11期1295-1302,共8页Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金(8227010768);科技部重点研发计划(2021YFC2500300);北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金青年培育基金(RDY2019-35);北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDL2023-12)。
摘 要:目的探讨异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)能否克服合并中枢神经系统白血病(CNSL)患者的不良预后以及预防性鞘内注射的意义。方法回顾性队列研究。收集2012年9月至2018年3月在北京大学人民医院接受allo-HSCT且移植前合并CNSL病史的30例急性白血病患者(CNSL阳性组);以疾病类型、患者疾病状态和移植类型为因素按1∶3进行严格匹配,从同期接受allo-HSCT的2807例急性白血病且移植前无CNSL的患者中选择90例患者作为对照(CNSL阴性组),利用Kaplan-Meier法、竞争分析法比较两组预后结局,以及Cox回归模型筛选移植后CNSL发生的高危因素。结果CNSL阴性组中位年龄大于CNSL阳性组(32岁比24岁,P=0.014),两组移植时性别、疾病类型、移植时疾病状态、供受者关系、人类白细胞抗原相合度等基线资料差异无统计学意义。总体随访中位时间为568 d(范围21~1852 d)。CNSL阳性组移植后4年白血病累积复发率高于CNSL阴性组(71.4%±20.9%比29.3%±11.5%,P=0.005),CNSL的4年累积发生率高于CNSL阴性组(33.6%±9.2%比1.2%±1.2%,P<0.001),4年无白血病生存率显著低于CNSL阴性组(23.1%±17.0%比71.5%±11.6%,P<0.001),差异均有统计学意义,但两组的4年累积移植相关死亡率和总体生存率差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。多因素分析提示移植前CNSL病史(HR=25.050,95%CI 3.072~204.300,P=0.003)是移植后CNSL发生的高危因素,单倍体移植与移植后CNSL发生减少相关(HR=0.260,95%CI 0.073~0.900,P=0.034)。CNSL阳性组中7例患者在移植后进行了预防性鞘内注射,CNSL的复发率显著低于移植后未进行鞘内注射的患者(0/7比9/23,P=0.048)。结论合并CNSL患者allo-HSCT后复发率较高、无白血病生存率较差,预防性鞘内注射似乎有助于降低此类患者复发率,但仍需大样本甚至前瞻性研究证实。Objective To investigate the potential of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(allo-HSCT)in mitigating the adverse prognosis associated with central nervous system leukemia(CNSL)and to assess the significance of prophylactic intrathecal injection.Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted involving 30 patients with acute leukemia who had a history of CNSL who underwent allo-HSCT at Peking University People′s Hospital between September 2012 and March 2018(referred to as the CNSL-positive group).In addition,90 patients with acute leukemia were selected from the same period who underwent allo-HSCT without a history of CNSL(referred to as the CNSL-negative group)and a rigorous 1∶3 matching was performed based on disease type,disease status,and transplantation type to form the control group.The prognosis between the two groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the high-risk factors for CNSL relapse post-transplant were identified through Cox proportional-hazards model.Results The median age of patients in the CNSL-negative group was significantly higher than that of patients in the CNSL-positive group(32 years vs.24 years,P=0.014).No significant differences were observed in baseline data,including sex,disease type,disease status at transplantation,donor-recipient relationship,and human leukocyte antigen consistency between the two groups.The median follow-up time was 568 days(range:21-1852 days).The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse(71.4%±20.9%vs.29.3%±11.5%,P=0.005)and the cumulative incidence of CNSL post-transplant(33.6%±9.2%vs.1.2%±1.2%,P<0.001)were significantly higher in the CNSL-positive group than in the CNSL-negative group.Furthermore,the 4-year leukemia-free survival rate in the CNSL-positive group was significantly lower than that in the CNSL-negative group(23.1%±17.0%vs.71.5%±11.6%,P<0.001).However,no significant differences were observed in the 4-year cumulative transplant-related mortality and overall survival rates between the two groups(both P>0.05).Mu
关 键 词:白血病 中枢神经系统 造血干细胞移植 急性白血病 异基因造血干细胞移植
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...