检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢少锋[1] 王佳然 LU Shaofeng;WANG Jiaran(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《济宁学院学报》2023年第5期62-67,共6页Journal of Jining University
摘 要:2018年的《刑事诉讼法》在立法层面上确立了刑事缺席审判制度。在被告人缺席诉讼的情况下,辩护权的行使缺位极易造成控辩双方不平等的局面,以至于损害被告人的知情和救济等权利。在强调诉讼效率的情形下,刑事缺席审判制度在保护被告人的权利与打击犯罪上存在一定的冲突,被告人权利的保障成为平衡效率与公正的关键。因此,在刑事缺席审判制度中实现被告人的权利保障迫在眉睫。The 2018 Criminal Procedure Law has established a criminal trial system in absentia at the legislative level.In the absence of the defendant in the litigation,the absence of the exercise of the right of defense can easily lead to an unequal situation between the prosecution and defense,so as to damage the defendant's rights for information and relief.Under the circumstance of emphasizing the efficiency of litigation,there is a certain conflict in the criminal absentia trial system between protecting the rights of defendants and fighting crime,and the protection of defendants'rights has become the key to balancing efficiency and fairness.Therefore,it is urgent to ensure the protection of the rights of the defendants in the criminal absentia trial system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16