检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨文 YANG Wen(Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)
机构地区:[1]南京大学哲学系,南京210023
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2023年第6期133-139,共7页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:环境危机的一个历史根源是人与自然在观念上的二元分裂,以奈斯为代表的深生态学家们则针锋相对地展示了人类主体通过扩展自我而“认同”自然的可能性。这一思想创见深刻,却有着陷于蒙昧的风险。在此议题上,进化论学说及其哲学阐释具有重要价值,它为人与自然的认同提供了理性基础。包括人在内的有机体本质性地消融在了与环境的关联中,人类与其他生物间的亲缘性也得到了重建。这一阐释不仅为认同自然的理想做出了重要支持,更启示我们重新思考生态哲学与实证科学间的复杂关系。One of the historical roots of the environmental crisis is the conceptual dichotomy between human and nature.Deep ecologists,represented by Arne Naess,demonstrated the possibility that human can“identify”with nature by expanding themselves.This idea is profound,but it also risks falling into obscurity.On this issue,the theory of evolution and its philosophical interpretation are of great value,providing a rational basis for the identification of man and nature.Organisms,including humans,have essentially dissolved in their association with the environment,and the affinities between humans and other organisms have also been reconstructed.This interpretation not only provides important support for recognizing the ideal of nature,but also enlightens us to rethink the complex relationship between ecological philosophy and empirical science.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.130