检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴艾琳 PEI Ailin
出 处:《历史教学问题》2023年第5期52-61,202,共11页History Research And Teaching
摘 要:20世纪20至30年代,随着近代中国的内忧外患日趋深重,历史学界对国家、疆域、民族等问题的讨论亦日益激烈。在此期间,蒙文通综合民族、文化、地理等维度,提出了“三系说”“中华民族东来说”及“民族移住与融合”等重要理论,建立起独具特点的古代民族论述体系。这些论述的提出,不仅试图回应当时颇受争议的各类学术议题,也展现了蒙文通以史学研究来承担重建国族认同、振兴中华重任的期望。因此,重新梳理蒙文通民族史观的建构过程,分析学术背后的时代风潮,不仅有益于理解蒙氏研究所蕴含的国族自信、民族历史、国家认同的面向,也对考察经典淡出之后的近代学术界如何接引传统学术、塑造现代民族史观等问题有重要意义。From the 1920s to the 1930s,with the increasingly severe domestic chaos and foreign invasion,Chinese historians hotly debated on the state,territorial and national issues.During this period,Meng Wentong comprehensively employed national,cultural and geographical dimensions to raise the theories like"the three ethnic lines","Chinese nation coming from the east",and"ethnic migration and integration",to build his special narration on ancient Chinese nation,which attempted to not only respond to various highly disputed academic topics of the time,but also express his vision of reconstructing the national identity and rejuvenating the Chinese nation by history studies.Re-examining Meng Wentong's view on national history and the background of the time helps us understand the national self-confidence and national identity contained in his works.It also helps us find out how the modern academic circle passed down traditional learning and shaped our modern view on national history when the Classics lost their significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28