机构地区:[1]国家癌症中心、国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心、中国医学科学院肿瘤医院核医学科(PET/CT中心),北京100021 [2]中日友好医院核医学科,北京100029 [3]中国医学科学院、北京协和医学院北京协和医院核医学科、疑难重症及罕见病全国重点实验室、核医学分子靶向诊疗北京市重点实验室,北京100730
出 处:《中华核医学与分子影像杂志》2023年第11期649-654,共6页Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
基 金:国家自然科学基金(82272046)。
摘 要:目的探讨同时靶向生长抑素受体(SSTR)和整合素αvβ3的新型双靶点分子探针68Ga-1,4,7-三氮杂环壬烷-1,4,7-三乙酸-3聚乙二醇-D-苯丙氨酸1-酪氨酸3-苏氨酸8-奥曲肽-精氨酸-甘氨酸-天冬氨酸(NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD)PET/CT显像用于神经内分泌肿瘤(NEN)的价值。方法前瞻性纳入2021年4月至2022年2月间北京协和医院的35例经病理证实的NEN患者[男19例、女16例,中位年龄54(41,61)岁],所有患者在1周内行68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD和68Ga-1,4,7,10-四氮杂环十二烷-1,4,7,10-四乙酸-D-苯丙氨酸1-酪氨酸3-苏氨酸8-奥曲肽(DOTATATE)PET/CT显像。采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较2种显像检出的病灶数目、SUV_(max)和肿瘤/本底比值(TBR)的差异。结果68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD和68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT显像检出的病灶总数分别为1190和1106个,两者均检出35个原发肿瘤,对淋巴结转移灶[4(1,8)和4(1,8)个;z=-0.45,P=0.655]及骨转移灶[5(2,60)和5(2,66)个;z=-1.11,P=0.244]的检测能力相当,但68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD检出的肝转移灶数量明显多于68Ga-DOTATATE[(17(6,27)和8(3,26)个;z=-2.31,P=0.021]。肿瘤的68Ga-DOTATATE摄取程度明显高于68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD摄取[SUV_(max):15.6(9.9,24.9)和12.7(8.0,18.4);z=-7.19,P<0.001],但肝转移灶68Ga-DOTATATE显像明显较68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD显像的TBR低[3.4(1.8,5.5)和6.1(3.8,10.8);z=-7.56,P<0.001]。结论68Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD对NEN肝转移灶的检出能力优于68Ga-DOTATATE,而对于其他部位病灶的检出能力与68Ga-DOTATATE相当。Objective To investigate the value of PET/CT imaging with ^(68)Ga-1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid-3 polyethylene glycol-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Thr8-octreotide Arg-Gly-Asp(NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD),a dual somatostatin receptor 2-and integrinαvβ3-targeting tracer,in the evaluation of neuroendocrine neoplasms(NEN).Methods From April 2021 to February 2022,35 patients(19 males,16 females;median age 54(41,61)years)with histologically confirmed NEN in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were prospectively enrolled.All patients were scanned with both ^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD and ^(68)Ga-1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid-D-Phe1-Tyr3-Thr8-octreotide(DOTATATE)PET/CT imaging within one week.The differences of the numbers of detected lesions,SUV_(max) and tumor-to-background ratio(TBR)between the two imaging methods were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Results Of the 35 patients,the total numbers of lesions detected by ^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD and ^(68)Ga-DOTATATE were 1190 and 1106,respectively.^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD and ^(68)Ga-DOTATATE both detected 35 primary tumors and performed comparably in detecting lymph node metastases(4(1,8)vs 4(1,8);z=-0.45,P=0.655)and bone metastases(5(2,60)vs 5(2,66);z=-1.11,P=0.244).However,the number of liver lesions detected by ^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD was significantly higher than that by ^(68)Ga-DOTATATE(17(6,27)vs 8(3,26);z=-2.31,P=0.021).^(68)Ga-DOTATATE demonstrated higher SUV_(max) than ^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD(15.6(9.9,24.9)vs 12.7(8.0,18.4);z=-7.19,P<0.001),while the TBR of liver metastases was significantly lower(3.4(1.8,5.5)vs 6.1(3.8,10.8);z=-7.56,P<0.001).Conclusion ^(68)Ga-NOTA-3P-TATE-RGD performs better than ^(68)Ga-DOTATATE in the detection of liver metastases,while is comparable to ^(68)Ga-DOTATATE in detecting lesions of other sites.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...