检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴辰凯 WU Chen-kai(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2023年第11期18-23,共6页Journal of Harbin University
摘 要:随着我国刑事程序的进步与公平正义观念深入人心,公众对参与司法过程的需求和热情呈现快速增长的趋势,公众通过网络平台参与司法过程成为主流。但网络舆论的盲目性以及片面性使得司法机关遭受一定压力,“网络审判”的盛行可能给当事人及其家属造成巨大伤害,宽松的网络环境使得无罪推定原则在相对开放的空间中被大量忽视。文章通过分析涉法网络舆论与无罪推定原则的关系,思考如何在尽可能不破坏网络言论自由的前提下尊重无罪推定原则,并研究对公检法机关、官方媒体涉法网络舆论进行规制,对自媒体与网民进行引导,对平台监督责任进行强化。With the progress of China’s criminal procedure and the popularization of the concept of fairness and justice,the public’s demand and enthusiasm for participating in the judicial process is showing a rapid growth trend.At present,the proportion of the public participating in the judicial process through online platforms is steadily increasing,but the blindness and one sidedness of online public opinion affects the neutrality of the judicial process.You need to use legal means to regulate.The loose network environment makes the principle of presumption of innocence largely ignored in a relatively open space.The article analyzes the relationship between law related online public opinion and the principle of presumption of innocence,and considers how to respect the principle of presumption of innocence without violating the freedom of online speech as much as possible.How to guide the self media and netizens,and how to strengthen the supervision responsibility of the platform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.1