检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵周华[1] 刘波 ZHAO Zhou-hua;LIU Bo(Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou 014010,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古科技大学经济与管理学院,内蒙古包头014010
出 处:《哈尔滨学院学报》2023年第11期76-79,共4页Journal of Harbin University
基 金:国家自然科学基金,项目编号:71964027;内蒙古哲学社会规划一般项目,项目编号:2018NDB084;内蒙古自然基金面上项目,项目编号:021MS07018。
摘 要:文章利用2020年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的微观数据,根据个体、家庭和社会三大风险指标体系对老年人口心理贫困风险水平进行了测度,发现我国约有四分之一的老年人存在中级致贫风险,家庭和社会风险的中级风险占比人数也较多,需要格外关注。从地区上看,老年人风险得分呈东、中、西递增,东北地区最高;对低、中、高龄老人分组分析后发现,低龄老人风险评分均值最高,高龄老人中高风险占比最高。文章最后针对调查情况提出了有针对性的、操作性强的老年贫困治理对策。The article uses micro data from the 2020 China Family Tracking Survey(CFPS)to measure the psychological poverty risk level of the elderly population based on the three major risk indicator systems of individual,family,and society.It is found that about a quarter of the elderly in China are at intermediate poverty risk,and the proportion of intermediate risks in family and social risks is also high,which requires special attention.From a regional perspective,the risk score of elderly people increases gradually in the east,middle,and west,with the highest in Northeast China.After grouping and analyzing the young,middle aged,and elderly,it was found that the average risk score of the young is the highest,and the proportion of high risk is the highest among the elderly.At the end of the article,targeted and highly operational measures for addressing elderly poverty were proposed based on the survey situation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7