劳动争议案件适用规范性文件司法实证研究——以《劳动合同法》第26条第1款第2项为例  

Judicial Empirical Study on Normative Documents Applied to Labor Disputes Cases:Based on Article 26,Paragraph 1,Item 2 of The Labor Contract Law

作　　者：王立明 牛文杰 Wang Liming;Niu Wenjie(Law School,University of Sanya,Sanya,Hainan 572022,China)

机构地区：[1]三亚学院法学院,海南三亚572022

出　　处：《大理大学学报》2023年第11期70-80,共11页Journal of Dali University

摘　　要：用人单位免除自己的法定责任、排除劳动者权利的,劳动合同无效。对此问题不仅劳动法学术界的研究不深,而且法院裁判的案件不多。从法院裁判文书上看:在裁审程序上,多“一裁一审”或“一裁两审”;在裁判结果上,劳动者胜诉居多;在法律责任承担上,多涉及金钱给付;在案由上,多采劳动争议案件一级案由。从法院裁判文书适用裁判依据归类,有正式法律规范和非正式法律规范两类。法院在处理此类案件时,在裁判文书的裁判依据与法院认为、合并表述与单独表述以及无效与撤销等方面可进一步改进。A labor contract shall be null and void if the employer exempts itself from legal responsibilities or excludes the rights of the worker.This issue hasnot beendeeplystudiedbythe academic research of labor law,and few cases about it are adjudicated by the court.From the court judgment documents,most relevant cases are based on a single adjudication ora second adjudication;From the results of the judgments,the laborers won most cases;On the assumption of legal responsibility,it mostly involves the payment of money;And in terms of cause of action,the first-class cause of action of labor dispute cases should be adopted.This paper classifies the basis for the application of court judgment documents into formal legal norms and informal legal norms.This paper holds that the court can further improve the judgment basis and opinion of the court,combined expression and separate expression,and invalidation and when dealing with such cases.

关 键 词：劳动合同 用人单位免除法定责任 排除劳动者权利 无效 撤销 

分 类 号：D922.591[政治法律—民商法学]