理性视角下辩论冲突话语的多模态研究  

A Multimodal Study on Conflict Talk from the Rationality Perspective

作　　者：陈颖 刘长江[1] CHEN Ying;LIU Changjiang(Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing Jiangsu,211106,China)

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学外国语学院,江苏南京211106

出　　处：《文化创新比较研究》2023年第28期30-33,共4页Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

摘　　要：该文从理性视角出发,运用理性的三个维度分析辩论冲突话语的句法模态、节奏模态、表情动作模态。从句法模态看,理性在陈述句、疑问句、感叹句、祈使句的使用中凸显程度各不相同。从节奏模态看,辩论中的冲突主体偏向于使用争夺性话语重叠策略,由此导致的冲突升级在一定程度上源于工具理性和评价理性的有所缺失。从表情动作模态看,冲突主体偏向于使用表情动作,如摇头、闭眼等,强调辩护自己的理性,批判对方理性,从而在一定程度上主动破坏人际和谐关系。该研究以2020年国外总统竞选的一场上半轮辩论话语为语料,探究双方在激烈辩论冲突时的潜在理性和双方理性认知的摩擦碰撞,以期为人际和谐关系的构建带来一定启示。From the rationality perspective,this paper analyzes conflict talk by using three dimensions of rationality in syntactic modality,rhythm modality and expression and movement modality.At the level of syntactic modality,rationality is highlighted to varying degrees in the use of declarative sentences,question sentence,exclamatory sentence and imperative sentence.At the level of rhythm modality,the conflict subjects in debate tend to use competitive discourse overlapping strategies,and the lack of instrumental rationality and evaluation rationality results in the escalation of conflict to a certain extent.At the level of expression and movement modality,the conflict subjects tend to use expression and movement to emphasize their own rationality and criticize the rationality of the other party by shaking head or closing eyes,thus undermining interpersonal harmony intentionally to some extent.This article takes the discourse of the first half of the 2020 foreign presidential election as the corpus to explore the potential rationality and the friction and collision of awareness of rationality between the two sides and aims for providing some inspiration for promoting interpersonal harmony.

关 键 词：多模态研究 辩论冲突 理性 人际和谐 冲突话语 理性认知 

分 类 号：H316[语言文字—英语]