论作为独立量刑情节的认罪认罚  

On Confession and Punishment as Independent Sentencing Circumstances

作　　者：孔令勇 Kong Lingyong

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院

出　　处：《荆楚法学》2023年第4期120-131,共12页Jingchu Law Review

基　　金：2022年国家社科基金青年项目“企业合规视野下企业认罪认罚从宽制度构建及适用研究”(项目编号:21CFX071)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：关于认罪认罚是否为独立量刑情节,理论与实务界的观点可用“程序理想型”“实体构建型”与“实务综合型”三种类型进行概括。当前,认罪认罚作为独立量刑情节虽无法律依据,却有相关量刑规范与指导意见支撑。而在理论上,认罪认罚情节独立可为认罪认罚的独特性、量刑从宽、控辩协商、被害人保护以及该制度引入实体法提供正当性依据。分析现有规范与案例可知,认罪认罚虽尚未成为法定量刑情节,但已成为酌定量刑情节,已经具有一定独立性。作为独立量刑情节,认罪认罚情节的司法适用需要重点解决其与法定量刑情节的区分、与同向或逆向量刑情节竞合时的适用以及在重罪与未成年人犯罪案件中的适用问题。The theoretical and practical perspectives on whether confession and punishment are independent sentencing circumstances can be summarized in three types:"procedural ideal type","entity construction type",and"practical comprehensive type".Currently,although there is no legal basis for pleading guilty to punishment as an independent sentencing circumstance,it is supported by relevant sentencing norms and guidance.In theory,the independent circumstances of confession and punishment can provide legitimacy for the uniqueness of confession and punishment,leniency in sentencing,negotiation between prosecution and defense,victim protection,and the introduction of substantive law into the system.Analyzing existing norms and cases,it can be seen that although confession and punishment have not yet become a statutory sentencing circumstance,they have become a discretionary sentencing circumstance and have a certain degree of independence.As an independent sentencing circumstance,the judicial application of the circumstances of guilty plea and punishment needs to focus on resolving the differences between them and the statutory sentencing circumstances,the application when they overlap with the same or reverse sentencing circumstances,and the application in serious crimes and juvenile delinquency cases.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 法定量刑情节 酌定量刑情节 司法适用 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]