《文心雕龙》的“人-文”二重结构及其理论体系  

The “Author-Text” Dual Structure and the Theoretical System of The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons

作　　者：陈特 Chen Te(Department of Chinese Language and Literature,Fudan University)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学中国古代文学研究中心、中文系

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2023年第5期43-51,共9页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：2021年度国家社会科学基金后期资助一般项目“诗赋兴替与六朝文学的演进”[项目编号:21FZWB076]的阶段性成果.

摘　　要：《文心雕龙》往往从“人”与“文”两方面展开论说。刘勰对人与文有一根本性区分:作文之人分两种——圣人与非圣人;相应地,由人写成之文亦分两类——经典与非经典。“圣人/经典”与“非圣人/非经典”之间存在鸿沟。这一区分所造成的“人-文”二重,是贯穿《文心雕龙》全书的关键线索,也是刘勰立论的基本结构。在“文之枢纽”部分,“人-文”二重结构能够解释《正纬》的次第与必要性。在“割[剖]情析采”部分,通过“人-文”二重结构,刘勰将出于道家思想脉络的“虚静”说妥帖地置入全书框架中,用以处理一般作者才性发挥的难题。而刘勰通论文章之“体势风貌”时,“体”“势”与“风骨”之异同,也可循“人-文”二重结构得到索解。The discussion in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons typically revolves around a fundamental dichotomy between the author and the text.Lie Xie categorized authors into two groups:the saint and the non-saint.Simultaneously,he classified their works as either classics or non-classics.This differentiation serves as a pivotal theme for comprehending Liu Xie's theorical framework,providing insight into his organization of the“Emendation of Apocrypha”in Chapter Four.Furthermore,it sheds light on Liu Xie's discourse concerning concepts such as“vacancy and tranquility”and“style,”which are contingent upon these distinctions.

关 键 词：《文心雕龙》 《正纬》 思 体 势 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]