检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毕迎春 白羽[1,2] 刘俊彤 苏洋[1,2] 王培培 张浩 BI Yingchun;BAI Yu;LIU Juntong;SU Yang;WANG Peipei;ZHANG Hao(School of Medical Information,Wannan Medical College,Wuhu 241002,China)
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院医学信息学院,安徽芜湖241002 [2]皖南医学院健康大数据挖掘与应用研究中心,安徽芜湖241002
出 处:《皖南医学院学报》2023年第6期598-600,共3页Journal of Wannan Medical College
基 金:安徽省教学示范课项目(2460,2462);安徽省高等学校省级质量工程项目(2021jyxm1613,2021sx178);皖南医学院教学质量与教学改革工程项目(2021ylkc03,2020jyxm37)。
摘 要:目的:探索BOPPPS教学模式在生物医学图像处理教学中的应用优势。方法:选择皖南医学院2019级医学信息工程专业本科生(n=63)作为研究组,采用BOPPPS教学模式,选择2018级医学信息工程专业本科生(n=64)作为对照组,采用传统教学模式,比较两组平时作业、实验成绩、期末成绩和总评成绩,进行教学效果对比。结果:研究组的平时作业、实验成绩、期末成绩和总评成绩(93.61±2.61、84.73±4.91、79.62±9.20、82.43±6.83)均高于对照组(90.59±4.22、80.45±2.44、75.84±9.57、78.75±7.15)(P<0.05);研究组平时作业优秀率(100.00%)与对照组(93.75%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组实验成绩优秀率、期末成绩优秀率、总评成绩优秀率(49.21%、38.10%、49.21%)均高于对照组(1.56%、21.88%、23.44%)(P<0.05)。结论:BOPPPS教学模式在生物医学图像处理课程中教学效果优于传统教学模式。Objective:To investigate the effect of bridge in-objective/outcome-pre-assessment-participatory learning-post-assessment-summary(BOPPPS)teaching mode in instruction of the curriculum Biomedical Image Processing.Methods:Undergraduates majoring in medical information engineering,enrolled in 2019,were included as study subjects(n=63),and those enrolled in 2018 were recruited as controls(n=64).Students in the study group were taught by BOPPPS,and those in the control group were instructed by traditional teaching mode.The two groups were compared regarding the performance in the homework and achievement in experiment,final term examination and overall evaluation result for the teaching effect.Results:The scores of homework,experiment,final term examination and overall evaluation results were higher in the study group than in the control group(93.61±2.61;84.73±4.91;79.62±9.20;82.43±6.83 vs.90.59±4.22;80.45±2.44;75.84±9.57;78.75±7.15,respectively,P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the excellent rate of homework between the two groups(100.00%vs.93.75%;P>0.05),yet students in the study group had higher excellent rate in experiment,final term examination and overall evaluation result than those in the control group(49.21%;38.10%;49.21%vs.1.56%;21.88%;23.44%,respectively,P<0.05).Conclusion:BOPPPS is superior to the traditional teaching mode in instruction of the curriculum Biomedical Image Processing.
关 键 词:BOPPPS教学模式 生物医学图像处理 教学效果
分 类 号:G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.239.228