新文科视域下中国政治制度史研究的政治学转向  

The Political Science Turn in the Study of the History of Chinese Political Systems from Perspective of New Humanities and Social Sciences

作　　者：季乃礼[1] 尹剑 Ji Naili;Yin Jian

机构地区：[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300350

出　　处：《新文科理论与实践》2023年第4期66-77,121,122,共14页Journal of New Humanities and Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金规划一般项目“传统治理视角下的当代基层治理问题研究”(20BZZ029)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：新文科强调学科的融合,坚持问题导向,新文科概念的提出给一些学科的发展带来启示。中国政治制度史的研究存在的困境就在于,作为历史学与政治学的综合学科,一直未与政治学融合,一直未能融入到政治学的传统之中。中国政治制度的研究者多经历历史学的训练,但踏入政治学领域之后,却没有完成政治学的转向,与政治学存在着方法、理论、术语以及关注议题上的割裂。要使政治制度史焕发新的生机,就必须重新站在政治学的学科定位上审视制度史研究,创新研究维度,以问题为导向,打通传统与现代、制度与思想、学科与学科之间的联系。The new humanities and social sciences emphasize the integration of disciplines and a problem-oriented approach.This new concept provides valuable insights for the development of certain disciplines.The study of the history of Chinese political systems is a case in point.As a comprehensive subject of history and politics,the study of the history of Chinese political systems has not been integrated with political science,and has never been a part of the traditional political science studies.Researchers of Chinese political systems have been well trained in history science generally,but fail to fully realize the turn of political science after entering this new field.There exists a disconnect between their studies and political science in terms of methodology,theories,terminology and focus of research.In order to revitalize the history of political institutions,it is necessary to re-examine the study of institutional history from the perspective of the discipline of political science,innovate the dimension of the study,take the problem as the guide,and open up the connection between tradition and modernity,system and ideology,and discipline and discipline.

关 键 词：新文科 中国政治制度史 政治学 历史学 

分 类 号：D69[政治法律—政治学]