对一事不再罚原则中构成要件理论的反思——以连续或继续性交通违法行为为例  

Reflection on the Constitutive Element Theory in the Principle of No-redundant-punishment——Taking Continuous or Continuing Traffic Violations as Example

作　　者：周桂党[1] 蔡晓洋 Zhou Guidang;Cai Xiaoyang

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第4期72-78,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：“过罚相当”是一事不再罚原则的理论基础,主要目的是防止行政机关滥用职权对相对人同一违法行为以相同的理由处以多次或不同的行政处罚。构成要件说是一事不再罚原则中“一事”认定的重要理论,是“不再罚”的前提,其包含四个要件:客观方面、社会危害性、主体、主观方面。构成要件说简洁明了,便于实施,但在具体认定交通违法行为时,仍存在缺陷,对于超速行为、违法停车行为等继续性的交通违法行为,严格适用构成要件理论出现了违背过罚相当根本目的的问题,对于连续闯红灯的连续性交通违法行为,严格适用构成要件理论将出现了行政处罚不可执行的特殊问题,均需在司法实践中根据不同的违法情形采用其他方法进行纠正和补充。"Excessive punishment is equivalent"is the theoretical basis of the principle of non-incident punishment,the main purpose is to prevent the administrative organ from abusing the power of the opposite person for the same illegal act to impose multiple or different administrative penalties for the same reason.The constitutive element theory is the important theory of"one thing"in the principle of no longer punishment for one thing,and it is the premise of"no longer punishment",which contains four elements:objective aspect,social harm,subject and subjective aspect.The constitutive elements are concise and easy to implement,but there are still defects in the specific identification of traffic violations.For continuous traffic violations such as speeding behaviors and illegal parking behaviors,the strict application of the constitutive elements theory has violated the fundamental purpose of punishment.Strict application of the constitutive elements theory will lead to the special problem of unenforceable administrative punishment,which should be corrected and supplemented by other methods according to different illegal situations in judicial practice.

关 键 词：一事不再罚 交通行政处罚 构成要件说 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]