向死而生:丸山真男的主体论  

Encounter the Death of Subject:The Political Regeneration of Subject in Maruyama Masao’s Thoughts

作　　者：王超 Wang Chao

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学历史学院

出　　处：《政治思想史》2023年第4期94-108,198,共16页Journal of the History of Political Thought

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“日本思想的近代形成史研究”(22JJD770016)的阶段成果。

摘　　要：丸山真男的主体论在继承近代日本思想界主体认识基调的同时,也随着时代课题的变化而不断深化自身的理解。20世纪40年代的主体论以荻生徂徕的“圣人”为代表,主张不受限制的自由主体。而50年代起,面对现代社会对人的异化,丸山真男转而关注主体对自身局限性的认识,主张建设一种自省主体。丸山真男的主体论将近代精神与近代制度进行分离,在继承近代主体性哲学传统的同时,也在探索与现代西方哲学不同的发展方向。While inheriting the basic understandings of the subject in modern Japanese thought,Maruyama Masao’s theory of the same theme has deepened in response to the changing issues of the times.In the 1940s,His ideal was a free subject without restriction,represented by the“sage”of OgyūSorai.However,from the 1950s,facing the alienation of human beings in modern society,Maruyama turned his attention to the subject’s awareness of his own limitations and advocated the construction of a self-reflective subject.Maruyama’s subject theory separates the modern spirit from the modern institutions,therefore explores a different direction from modern Western philosophy.

关 键 词：丸山真男 主体论 “近代主义” 

分 类 号：K313.4[历史地理—历史学] K313.5[历史地理—世界史] B313[哲学宗教—外国哲学]