蒯通形象嬗递与《史记》《汉书》《资治通鉴》人物书写  

The Image Evolution of Kuai Tong and Character Writing in Historical Records,The History of the Former Han Dynasty,and Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government

作　　者：杨玲[1] 马皓斌 YANG Ling;MA Haobin(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学文学院,兰州730000

出　　处：《渭南师范学院学报》2023年第12期16-25,共10页Journal of Weinan Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目:《韩非子》互见文献整理与研究(21BZW078)。

摘　　要：蒯通是秦末汉初著名策士,《史记》《汉书》《资治通鉴》均对其有载。对读三部典籍的蒯通书写,可以发现相关文本在细节上存在变化和差异,从而使蒯通形象呈现出权变之士、利口之覆邦家者、乘时徼利之人的嬗递。对此进行分析可以管窥不同书写体例、书写立场、书写旨趣对《史》《汉》《通鉴》人物书写的影响。同时还看到,在对书写权力的使用上,司马迁、班固和司马光都能遵循自先秦就形成的不虚美、不隐恶的书写原则,但又因中国史学“求真”的最终目的为“致用”,故而允许文学润饰手段介入史录。Kuai Tong was a famous strategist in the late Qin and early Han Dynasties,who was recorded in Historical Records,The History of the Former Han Dynasty,and Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government.Reading the writings about Quai Tong in the three classics,it can be found that there are changes and differences in the details of the relevant texts which should not be ignored and makes the image of Quai Tong emerge as a changeable man,a sharp-toned who can overturn a state or a kingdom and a man who takes advantage of the situation at the time.By analyzing this,we can get a glimpse of the influence of different writing styles,writing positions and writing purport on character writing in Historical Records,The History of the Former Han Dynasty,and Comprehensive Mirror to Aid in Government.At the same time,it is also seen that in the use of writing power,Sima Qian,Ban Gu and Sima Guang can follow the pre-Qin writing principle of not exaggerating the good and not concealing evil,but because the ultimate goal of Chinese historiography is that“truth”is“practical”,the means of literary embellishments to intervene in historical records can be allowed.

关 键 词：蒯通 形象 《史记》 《汉书》 《资治通鉴》 人物书写 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]