中国参与全球卫生治理背景下的全球卫生教学研究生课程比较分析  

Comparison of postgraduate global health courses in the context of China participating in global health governance

作　　者：关百初 葛慧[3] 陆一涵 Guan Baichu;Ge Hui;Lu Yihan(Global Health Institute,School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Department of Epidemiology,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety,School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China;Discipline Research Office of School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学公共卫生学院全球健康研究所,上海200032 [2]复旦大学公共卫生学院流行病学教研室教育部公共卫生安全重点实验室,上海200032 [3]复旦大学公共卫生学院学科科研办公室,上海200032

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2023年第11期1601-1605,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

基　　金：中国学位与研究生教育学会(全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会)(A2-,20170301-01);上海市公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划-重点学科建设(2020—2022)(GWV-10.1-XK03)。

摘　　要：我国正以积极姿态,多方面、多层次参与全球卫生治理,优化我国全球卫生课程体系、加强全球卫生学科建设、提升学生的全球卫生素养是全球卫生教育的时代要求。本研究介绍了“全球卫生研究——理论与实践”与“全球卫生领导力”两门全球卫生课程,通过比较教学目标、课程内容、教学方式以及教学评价,分析了目前我国全球卫生课程的优势与不足,探讨了课程建设与优化方案,为课程体系完善、教学提升、人才培养提供参考依据。As China is actively participating in global health governance in multiple dimensions at multiple levels,Chinese education on global health requires optimizing the curriculum system,strengthening the discipline construction,and improving students'literacy of global health.This study compared two postgraduate courses on global health,Global Health Study:Principles and Practice and Global Health Leadership in Practice,in terms of teaching objectives,course contents,teaching methods,and teaching evaluation.We analyzed the advantages and limitations in the current global heath curriculum,and explored course construction and improvement.We hope to provide a reference for improving the curriculum,teaching,and talent cultivation in the field of global health.

关 键 词：全球卫生 教学 课程比较 

分 类 号：R1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]