检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谌锦华 李卫国[1] SHEN Jinhua;LI Weiguo(College of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,Guizhou,China)
出 处:《安顺学院学报》2023年第6期97-101,共5页Journal of Anshun University
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“案外第三人撤销之诉研究”(14BFX157)。
摘 要:电子竞技纠纷解决机制主要是由官方决定、调解、和解、仲裁、诉讼等方式构成。当前,电子竞技纠纷解决机制中存在解纷路径较多却适用不畅,官方协会在解决电子竞技纠纷中有瑕疵,缺乏专业中立的机构解决纠纷等问题阻碍其功能实现。为保障电子竞技纠纷得以妥善处理,进而促进电子竞技产业发展,应当疏通电子竞技解决纠纷渠道、健全预防纠纷机制以及发挥仲裁优势疏解电子竞技纠纷。The e-sports dispute resolution mechanism is mainly composed of official decisions,mediation,reconciliation,arbitration,litigation and other ways.At present,there are many ways to resolve disputes in the e-sports dispute resolution mechanism,but the application is not smooth,the official association has flaws in solving e-sports disputes,and the lack of professional neutral institutions to solve disputes hinder the realization of its functions.In order to ensure that e-sports disputes can be properly handled,and then promote the development of the e-sports industry,we should dredge the e-sports dispute resolution channels,improve the dispute prevention mechanism,and give play to the advantages of arbitration to dredge e-sports disputes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169