检察环境民事公益诉讼的法理依据与实效提升  

he Legal Basis and Effectiveness Improvement of Prosecutorial Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation

作　　者：李德恩[1] LI De’en(School of Law,Jiujiang University,Jiujiang,Jiangxi 332005,China)

机构地区：[1]九江学院法学院,江西九江332005

出　　处：《中州大学学报》2023年第6期48-54,共7页Journal of Zhongzhou University

基　　金：江西省社会科学基金项目“以人民为中心视阈下司法公信力系统提升研究”(21FX07D)。

摘　　要：检察环境公益诉讼是检察机关助力绿色发展的重要途径。第三人的诉讼担当、形式当事人概念的提出为民事主体与诉讼主体的分离奠定了理论基础。我国《民事诉讼法》以及《环境保护法》等相关法律的修订为检察环境公益诉讼的开展提供了法律依据。检察环境公益诉讼成为民事诉讼正当当事人理论演进在中国的实践成果。为了提升环境保护与生态修复的实效性,立法应该基于检察环境公益诉讼的公益性、补充性、修复性等特点进行完善;检察机关需要更加重视支持起诉工作,更加重视审判程序、执行程序中的检行协同,加强对生态环境修复资金使用效能的监管。Prosecutorial environmental public interest litigation is an important way for procuratorial organs to support green development.The concept of third-party litigation undertaking and formal parties provides theoretical support for the separation of civil subjects and litigation subjects.The revision of relevant laws such as the Civil Procedure Law and the Environmental Protection Law in China provides a legal basis for the development of environmental public interest litigation.Prosecutorial environmental public interest litigation has become a practical achievement of the evolution of the theory of legitimate parties in civil litigation in China.In order to enhance the effectiveness of environmental protection and ecological restoration,legislation should be improved based on the public welfare,supplementary,and restorative characteristics of environmental public interest litigation.The prosecutorial organs need to pay more attention to supporting prosecution work,pay more attention to the collaboration between prosecutorial and administrative organs in trial and execution procedures,and strengthen the supervision of the efficiency of the use of ecological environment restoration funds.

关 键 词：诉讼担当 检察机关 民事公益诉讼 检行协同 实效性 

分 类 号：D925.11[政治法律—诉讼法学]