融合与冲突:梁启超新民思想的内在理路  

Integration&Conflict:The Inner Rationale of Liang Qichao's Xinmin Thought

作　　者：杜溯 DU Su(Guizhou Open University,Guiyang 550004)

机构地区：[1]贵州开放大学,贵阳550004

出　　处：《贵州开放大学学报》2023年第4期65-71,共7页Journal of Guizhou Open University

摘　　要：二十世纪初,在中西文化激烈碰撞的背景下,梁启超积极探索社会变革,提出了以改造国民性为主要内容的新民思想。文章从中学与西学的角度,梳理了新民思想形成的理论依据和渊源;从思想演进及实践视角,分析了梁启超试图将道德观与救亡主题进行调和的中庸尝试尽显矛盾冲突的不相适应性;从救国方案与社会变革相脱离的实际,揭示了“新国”必先“新民”的改良立场有悖于逻辑关系之主观局限性。文章通过深入解读与思考,概括了新民思想体系保守、动摇以及不和谐、不彻底的特点,同时肯定了其对中国文化传统进行反省与主张变革的进步意义,对学界深入系统研究梁启超新民思想提供了借鉴之思。At the beginning of the 20th century,against the backdrop of intense collision between Chinese and Western cultures,Liang Qichao actively explored social change and put forward the new idea of transforming national character as the main content.The article examines the theoretical basis and origin of the new idea from the perspective of Chinese and Western learning;from the perspective of the evolution of thought and practice,it analyzes the reasons why Liang Qichao's attempt to reconcile morality and politics with the doctrine of the mean is not suitable but instead reveals contradictions and conflicts;from the practical perspective of the country's salvation plan and social change,it reveals the limitations of the reformist position of"new nation"must first be"new people".Through in-depth interpretation and reflection,the article reveals that the new idea system is conservative,shaky,disharmonious,and incomplete,and also affirms its progressive significance in reflecting on and advocating for change in Chinese cultural traditions.It provides a reference for the in-depth and systematic study of Liang Qichao's new idea in the academic community.

关 键 词：梁启超 新民思想 国民性 西方近代学说 

分 类 号：B259.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]