对康德先验演绎合法性的辩护——以盖耶尔、阿里森的新近研究为中心的考察  

The Defense of the Legitimacy of Kant′s Transcendental Deduction:An Investigation Centered on the Recent Research of Guyer and Allison

作　　者：关曾玮 GUAN Zeng-wei(School of Philosophy,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430061)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430061

出　　处：《巢湖学院学报》2023年第4期22-31,共10页Journal of Chaohu University

摘　　要：先验演绎的论证目标是证明范畴的客观有效性。但是,随着研究的逐步推进,学界对先验演绎究竟能否完成这个目标展开了争论。部分学者认为证明范畴的客观有效性这一目标只有到了原理分析论中才真正完成。然而,通过对康德文本的细致考察以及对有关概念的误解的澄清发现,对于先验演绎无法完成其预定目标的担忧是不必要的,先验演绎的逻辑是自洽的,无需原理分析论的补充,先验演绎自身亦可以完成本就属于它的目标。The goal of transcendental deduction is to prove the objective validity of the category.However,with the gradual progress of the research,whether the transcendental deduction can achieve this goal has been debated in the academic circles.Some scholars believe that the objective validity of proving the category can only be truly achieved in analytic of principles.However,through the careful investigation of Kant′s texts and the clarification of the misunderstanding of relevant concepts,we can find that it is unnecessary to worry about the failure of transcendental deduction to achieve its intended goal.The logic of transcendental deduction is self-contained,and it does not need the supplement of analytic of principles.The transcendental deduction itself can also achieve its own goal.

关 键 词：康德 先验演绎 形式直观 知性范畴 

分 类 号：B516.31[哲学宗教—外国哲学]