语言政策民族志本土化路径探究  

Localization of the Ethnography of Language Policy

作　　者：郑咏滟[1] 王思璇 ZHENG Yongyan;WANG Sixuan(College of Foreign Languages and Literature,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学外国语言文学学院,上海200433

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第1期38-45,共8页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金第74批面上资助(2023M740718)。

摘　　要：随着语言政策与规划研究的实证转向,语言政策民族志所包含的本体论、认识论和方法论越来越得到国际语言规划与政策研究的重视。然而,这一研究范式尚未在我国得到充分关注。文章厘清语言政策民族志的内涵、方法及应用,阐述语言政策民族志对语言规划学科的重要意义,并提出语言政策民族志本土化的3点建议:一是培养本土文化意识,将研究置于地方历史文化中进行阐释;二是积极探索替代性认识论、方法论和其他会话资源;三是坚持中国立场,保持批判性反思,以期为探究适用于中国特色的语言规划理论提供借鉴和参考。With the paradigm shift in language policy and planning(LPP)research,the ontological,epistemological and methodological perspectives of the ethnography of language policy have attracted a wide attention from oversea LPP researchers.However,this approach has not received sufficient attention in China.This paper clarifies the implications,methods and application of the ethnography of language policy,expounds its great significance in language planning as a discipline,and recommends three strategies for the localization of the ethnography of language policy:the first is to enhance the localized cultural consciousness and give interpretations of the relevant research in the domain of the local history and culture;the second is to actively explore alternative epistemology,methodology and other conversational resources;the third is to adhere to China’s stance and maintain critical reflections to provide some enlightenment for exploring the theoretical framework for the language planning with Chinese characteristics.

关 键 词：语言政策民族志 语言政策与规划 本土化 质性转向 中国立场 

分 类 号：H0-0[语言文字—语言学]