清初朱素臣《聚宝盆》对沈万三、朱元璋的再书写  

Zhu Suchen’s Treasure Basin’s Rewriting on Shen Wansan and Zhu Yuanzhang

作　　者：陈昱杰 刘天振[2,3] CHEN Yujie;LIU Tianzhen

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学,金华321004 [2]浙江师范大学人文学院,金华321004 [3]浙江师范大学江南文化研究中心,金华321004

出　　处：《浙江艺术职业学院学报》2023年第4期7-13,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Vocational Academy of Art

摘　　要：苏州派剧作家朱素臣在清初撰作《聚宝盆》传奇。《聚宝盆》没有选择大部分笔记小说中记载的沈万三商人形象,而是选择了渔夫形象,反映了明末清初苏松地区的遗民形象。沈万三以渔夫入世遭厄,正是对明末清初文人士大夫仕与隐困境的再书写,也是作者本人在其中的心路历程的曲折展现。同时,《聚宝盆》将朱元璋塑造为英主形象,全剧极力为朱元璋开脱,认为朱元璋对沈万三的盘剥是由于张尤儿的谗言。这种为君主开脱而归罪小人的叙事逻辑,与明末清初士大夫对明亡的归因不谋而合,其根源在于天人感应说的内在矛盾。Zhu Suchen wrote the Treasure Basin in the early Qing Dynasty.Treasure Basin does not choose the image of Shen Wansan’s merchant recorded in most literary notes but chooses the image of a fisherman,reflecting the image of the Ming’s adherents in the Susong region in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties.Shen Wansan’s entry into the world as a fisherman is a re-writing of the literati’s dilemma between hidden and being out in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties,and it is also a tortuous display of his own mental journey in it.At the same time,Treasure Ba⁃sin portrays Zhu Yuanzhang as the image of the wise monarchy,and the whole play tries to excuse Zhu Yuanzhang,believing that Zhu Yuanzhang’s exploitation of Shen Wansan is due to Zhang Youer’s rumors.This narrative logic of exculcating the monarch and attributing the villain coincides with the attribution of the demise of the Ming Dynasty by the late Ming and early Qing scholars,and its root is the inherent contradiction of the theory of Heaven-Human In⁃duction.

关 键 词：《聚宝盆》 沈万三 朱元璋 朱素臣 

分 类 号：J803[艺术—戏剧戏曲]