论孙子诡道思想于谎言符号研究之裨益  

On the Benefits of Sun Tzu's Tao of Deceit on the Study of Deceptive Signs

作　　者：徐结平 王永祥[2] XU Jieping;WANG Yongxiang(School of Foreign Languages,Chaohu University,Hefei 238024,China;School of Foreign Languages,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]巢湖学院外国语学院,安徽合肥238024 [2]南京师范大学外国语学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《滨州学院学报》2023年第5期17-25,共9页Journal of Binzhou University

基　　金：安徽省哲学社会科学规划办青年项目“孙子的符号思想与国际形象构建研究”(AHSKQ2021D187)。

摘　　要：谎言的符号性与符号的谎言功能受到国际符号学界的关注,但成果多为零散的静态阐释,缺乏系统性与针对性,且概念界定存在漏洞。《孙子兵法》蕴藏丰富的符号学思维,以现代符号学观之,发现孙子遵行的是溯因推理;战场上不同类型的符号,可信度与可操控性的存在差异;孙子的“诡道”十二法,可观照谎言符号的动态生成过程。此研究既能生成中华经典的再阐释,发掘中国传统符号思想,又能填补当前国际符号学界对谎言研究的空白。The semiotic features of lies and the deceptive function of signs have gained a momentum in international semiotic community,despite the fact that most of these interpretations are scattered and static and lack systematic study.Furthermore,there are some drawbacks in the definition.The Art of War is rich in semiotic thought,and the study from the perspective of modern semiotics found that Sun Tzu adheres to abductive reasoning.Different types of signs on the battlefield reflect the differences in credibility and maneuverability.Specifically,Sun Tzu's twelve ways of"Tao of deceit"demonstrate the dynamic process of its formation of deceptive signs.This study can not only generate a new interpretation of the Chinese classics and investigate traditional Chinese symbolic thought,but it can also fill in the gaps in current international semiotic research on the study of lies.

关 键 词：《孙子兵法》 谎言 符号类型 可信度 操控度 诡道 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学] E8922[军事]