检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张静文 刘晓波[1] 李胜保[1] ZHANG Jing-wen;LI Xiao-bo;LI Sheng-bao(Department of Gastroenterology,Taihe Hospital,Hubei University of Medicine,442000 Shiyan,Hubei,China)
机构地区:[1]湖北医药学院附属十堰市太和医院消化内科,湖北十堰442000
出 处:《临床消化病杂志》2023年第6期495-499,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
基 金:十堰市科技局基金资助项目(No:19 Y44);太和医院院级基金资助项目(No:2019 JJXM032,2020 JJXM032)。
摘 要:[目的]研究早期食管鳞状细胞癌(esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ESCC)及癌前病变行内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection, ESD)后切缘阳性的相关危险因素及其预后情况。[方法]对因早期ESCC和(或)癌前病变行ESD后患者的临床病理资料行回顾性研究。根据术后病理组织切缘是否阳性,分为切缘阳性组和切缘阴性组,收集2组患者临床、内镜、病理学结果,分析术后切缘阳性发生的危险因素和预后情况。[结果]共纳入患者88例,切除病灶99处,切缘阴性85处,切缘阳性14处,切缘阳性率为14.14%(14/99),局部复发率为1.01%(1/99)。单因素分析提示,2组手术时间、术后并发症、标本长度、环周面积、钳检组织学异同、病理类型比较差异有统计学意义。切缘阳性组内镜随访,追加手术3例,术后病检均未发现淋巴结转移;1例在随访9个月后发现复发并有新发病灶,再次行ESD。[结论]标本长度和病理类型是ESCC及癌前病变ESD术后切缘阳性的独立危险因素,临床医生需严格把控适应证,加强ESD术中、术后的质量管理。[Objective]To study the risk factors and prognosis of positive incisal margin in early esopha-geal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)after endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD).[Methods]From Janu-ary 1,2016 to December 31,2020,patients with early ESCC and/or precancerous lesions underwent ESD surgery in Gastroenterology Department of Taihe hospital were retrospectively studied.According to whether the margin of postoperative pathological tissue was positive or not,the patients were divided into two groups:positive margin group and negative margin group.The clinical,endoscopic and pathological re-sults of the two groups were collected,and the risk factors and prognosis of positive margin after operation were analyzed.[Results]Among 88 patients,99 lesions were removed,85 were negative and 14 were posi-tive.The positive rate of the margin was 14.14%(14/99),and the local recurrence rate was 1.01%(1/99).Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in operation time,postoperative compli-cations,specimen length,circumferential area,histological differences and pathological types between the two groups.Endoscopic follow-up in the positive incision group,3 cases were added with surgery,and no lymph node metastasis was found after operation One patient was followed up for 9 months and found to have recurrence and new lesions,and underwent ESD operation again.[Conclusion]Specimen length and pathological type are independent risk factors for positive incision margin after ESD operation for early e-sophageal squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions.Clinicians should strictly control indications and strengthen quality management during and after ESD operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222