检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:江程铭 陈李娜 马家涛 王蕾[1] 何铨[2] 孙庆洲 孙红月[3] Jiang Chengming;Chen Lina;Ma Jiatao;Wang Lei;He Quan;Sun Qingzhou;Sun Hongyue(School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou,310023;College of Public Administration,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou,310023;College of Education,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai,200234)
机构地区:[1]浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023 [2]浙江工业大学公共管理学院,杭州310023 [3]上海师范大学教育学院,上海200234
出 处:《心理科学》2023年第6期1368-1374,共7页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(21BSH167)的资助。
摘 要:在跨期选择的研究中,决策者偏好递增还是递减序列存在争论。本研究提出不同的结果类型(金钱结果 vs.消费结果)导致了决策者在序列中偏好不一致的现象。结果发现:(1)在消费结果下,决策者偏好递增序列;在金钱结果下,决策者偏好递减序列;(2)收益目标(尽快获得更好的结果)和改善目标(获得的结果越来越好)的目标凸显性在其中起到了中介作用,决策者在金钱结果序列中更注重收益目标,而在消费结果序列中更注重改善目标;(3)金钱结果序列的选项内部结构(梯度大小)会影响两个冲突目标的凸显性,从而影响决策者偏好递减的程度。本文提示研究者和管理者需区分结果类别的不同对序列偏好的影响。Researchers have generally accepted the conclusion that people prefer improving sequences to deteriorating ones since the work of Loewenstein and his colleagues in the 1990s.Nevertheless,recent research using unlabeled money as outcomes has found the opposite preference.Because these contradictions are found in different studies,it is difficult to compare them directly.The aim of the current study is to directly compare the preference for sequences of unlabeled money with the preference for sequences of consumption.This research consisted of four experiments.A total of 1498 participants finished those experiments.One hundred and ninety-nine participated in Experiment 1A,428 in Experiment 1B,445 in Experiment 2A,and 426 in Experiment 2B.Experiments 1A and 1B used between-subject and within-subject designs respectively to compare the sequence preferences for money outcome with that for consumable outcome,with these two outcomes controlled(Experiment 1B)or not(Experiment 1A).Experiment 2A asked participants to recall and qualify the importance of two goals which are“getting better outcomes as soon as possible”and“outcomes becoming better”in the decision-making process.The aim of Experiment 2A was to examine the mediating roles of these two goals.Experiment 2B further tested the roles of the two goals in the preference for monetary sequence by manipulating the gradient of the sequence outcomes.The results of Experiments 1A and 1B showed that the preference for deteriorating sequences was stronger in the sequence of monetary outcomes than for the sequence of consumable outcomes(in Experiment 1A:χ2(1)=68.37,p<.001,φ=.59;in Experiment 1B:χ2(1)=88.53,p<.001,φ=.45).Furthermore,participants preferred deteriorating monetary sequence,while preferred improving consumable sequence.Experiment 2A indicated the mediating role of the goals of“getting better outcomes as soon as possible”and“outcomes becoming better”.Specifically,it demonstrated that,compared to participants in the condition of consumable outcome
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15