设计学:在“科学”与“学科”之间——认识论视角下的西方设计学论争及其对中国的启示  

Design Studies:between "Science" and "Discipline"——The Western Controversy over Design Studies from an Epistemological Perspective and Its Implications for China

作　　者：张萌秋 

机构地区：[1]北京大学新闻与传播学院

出　　处：《创意与设计》2023年第6期24-30,共7页Creation and Design

基　　金：国家社科基金艺术学重大项目(23ZD14)。

摘　　要：2022年,《研究生教育学科专业目录》将设计学移入交叉学科门类,在一定程度上改变了传统上对设计学艺术属性的认知,也促使学者们热议设计学的学科建设问题。由于在西方关于设计学学科问题的争论有着较长的历史,因此西方的相关论争可以作为中国学科建设的前车之鉴。有鉴于此,本文考察了西方设计学界的相关文献,并围绕“设计学是科学还是学科”这一认识论问题展开讨论。西方设计学界的相关论争已经勾勒出4种认识论范式,其中跨学科性范式在当代设计研究中尤其得到强调。通过对既有范式的梳理特别是跨学科范式的讨论,本文认为中国设计学建设需要重点关注“学科间性”及“主体性”这两个层面,以此推动中国设计学三大体系的构建。In 2022,the Graduate Professional Catalog reclassified design studies into the category of interdisciplinary disciplines,which has,to some extent,altered the traditional perception of the artistic nature of design studies and also sparked heated discussions among scholars about the construction of the design discipline.Given that the debate over the disciplinary issues of design studies has a long history in the West,the related controversies there can serve as lessons for China 's disciplinary construction.With this in mind,this paper reviews the relevant Western literature on design studies and discusses the epistemological question of "Is design studies a science or a discipline?".The debate in the Western design community has outlined four epistemological paradigms,among which the interdisciplinary paradigm is particularly emphasized in contemporary design research.By sorting out the existing paradigms,especially the discussion of the interdisciplinary paradigm,this paper suggests that the construction of design studies in China should focus on the two levels of "interdisciplinarity" and "subjectivity" to promote the establishment of China's three major systems of design studies.

关 键 词：设计学 科学 学科 学科间性 主体性 

分 类 号：J50-4[艺术—艺术设计]