资产的数字化革命和革命的数字资产法  

Digital Revolution of Assets and Revolutionary Digital Assets Law

作　　者：陈雪萍[1] Chen Xueping(School of Law,South-Central Minzu University,Hubei Wuhan 430074,China)

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期119-135,152,共18页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“数字资产信托法律问题研究”(21BFX190);中央高校基金项目“‘双碳’目标下碳排放权交易的法律问题及信托法对策研究”(37302/CSP21006)。

摘　　要：科技带来资产的“数字化革命”,数字资产已成为社会和经济生活中的重要部分,实体经济的数字资产的上市发行指日可待,这些为数字经济的发展提供更多的机遇,需要强有力的法律保障。各国理论界、实务界抑或立法对有关数字资产概念的厘定和权威认定阙如,但国外学者对数字资产进行的分类表达,域外法律对数字资产内涵的界定以及数字资产性质的司法认定,为我国数字资产立法提供有益的借鉴。我国《民法典》是数字资产保护的法律依据,但对其上位概念网络虚拟财产缺乏准确的定位,司法实践中,法官对其法律本质的认定存在较大分歧,对相关权益保护的观点也基本采取否定态度。为此,立法者可在扩张解释《民法典》的基础上,厘定网络虚拟财产的概念,明定其作为财产权利的客体;同时制定《数字资产保护法》,在严格区分传统网络虚拟财产和数字资产的基础上,对数字资产进行分类保护,从而解决与之相关的破产、信托、担保、继承、投融资等难题。Technology has brought about the“digital revolution”of assets,and digital assets have become an important part of social and economic life.The listing and issuance of digital assets combined with the real economy is just around the corner,providing more opportunities for the development of the digital economy and requiring strong legal protection.The identification and authoritative recognition of the concept of digital assets in the theoretical,practical or legislative circles of various countries are lacking,but the classified expression of digital assets by foreign scholars,the specific expression of the connotation of digital assets in foreign laws,and the judicial recognition of the property attributes of digital assets provide useful references for the legislation of digital assets in China.The digital revolution of assets must be guaranteed by the revolutionary digital assets law.The identification of the legal concept of digital assets is not only related to the transaction itself,but also will greatly affect many legal relationships involving digital assets such as infringement,bankruptcy,inheritance,trust,guarantee,investment,and financing.Due to the vague and abstract provisions of Article 127 of China's Civil Code,and the fact that digital assets themselves are a new type of property,existing legal rules are difficult to provide comprehensive protection,and the identification and characterization of digital assets have become difficult.Although Article 127 of China's Civil Code provides space for expanding interpretation of the legal protection of digital assets from the legal level and is the legal basis for the protection of digital assets,there is a lack of accurate positioning of its superior concept of network virtual property.In judicial practice,judges have great differences in the identification of its legal essence and basically adopt a negative attitude towards the protection of relevant rights and interests.To this end,lawmakers can identify the concept of network virtual property and d

关 键 词：数字资产 概念 厘定 立法 展望 

分 类 号：D912[政治法律—法学]