检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贺方彤 HE Fangtong(Law School of Central South University,Changsha,Hunan 410083,China)
出 处:《医学与法学》2024年第1期48-53,共6页Medicine and Jurisprudence
摘 要:在因工作性质而易于接触到公民的健康生理信息并对其进行处理的过程中,医疗行业工作人员若无正当化事由而将之非法转移,即有可能被科以刑罚。随着医疗活动在大数据时代的信息化,公民的健康生理信息应从医疗行业内部作溯源性保护;而由于对之保护的刑事规范阙如,加上侵犯的行为主体范围模糊,这就使相应的刑法规制陷入困境。为厘清侵犯公民的健康生理信息行为的罪与非罪的界限,以便更好地适用相关刑法的规定,进一步澄清司法解释中未展开阐释的“健康生理信息”的内涵及对其侵犯之行为的特定主体,需要将未达到相当法益侵害性的行为排除出刑法规制的范围。In the process of processing and easily accessing to citizens'health physiological information due to the nature of their work,medical workers who illegally transfer it without legitimate reasons may be subject to punishment.With the informationization of medical activities in the era of big data,citizens'health physiological information should be traceable within the medical industry;how⁃ever,due to the absence of criminal norms for its protection and the ambiguity of the scope of the infringing subject,the corresponding criminal law regulation falls into a dilemma.In order to clarify the boundary between crime and non-crime of violating citizens'health physiological information behavior,so as to better apply the provisions of relevant criminal law,and further clarify the connotation of"health physiological information"that is not explained in judicial interpretation and the specific subject of its infringement,it is neces⁃sary to exclude the behavior that does not achieve considerable legal interest infringement from the scope of criminal law regulation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7