以急救思路为主导的新型教学法对中医急诊教学效果的探讨  

Discussion on the Effect of New Teaching Method Based on Emergency Thinking on the Teaching of TCM Emergency

作　　者：尹鹏英 王晨曦 吴丽娟[1] 梅建强[1] 成立[1] 陈分乔[1] Yin Pengying;Wang Chenxi;Wu Lijuan;Mei Jianqiang;Cheng Li;Chen Fenqiao(Hebei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hebei,Shijiazhuang 050011,China)

机构地区：[1]河北省中医院,河北石家庄050011 [2]河北中医学院,河北石家庄050020

出　　处：《中国中医急症》2024年第1期160-162,共3页Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：河北省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(2020GJJG209)。

摘　　要：目的探讨传统教学法和以学生为中心、案例分析为核心、急救思路为主导的新型教学法对中医急诊教学效果的影响。方法根据自愿原则选取2018级河北中医学院中医专业学生60人,随机分成A、B两组,由同一教师分别对“厥证”“脱证”“卒心痛”“心衰”4节课进行不同的教学模式,A组对上述4节课接受传统教学法的教学模式,B组接受以学生为中心、案例分析为核心、急救思路为主导的新型教学法。授课结束后进行统一考试,检查学生理论知识学习情况,同时发放问卷调查进行教学效果评估。结果B组应用新型教学法的同学“厥证”“脱证”“卒心痛”“心衰”理论考试成绩平均分分别为(84.66±7.85)、(85.06±8.11)、(85.30±6.75)、(84.23±7.20)分,均高于A组应用传统教学法的(79.73±8.08)、(79.23±8.28)、(79.36±7.62)、(77.76±7.95)分,两组平均分之间的差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。问卷调查显示,B组在学习兴趣、自学能力、教学方式满意度、是否明白疾病需关注方面、临床急救思维能力各方面的得分及总分分别为(7.01±1.11)、(7.52±1.00)、(7.38±0.96)、(7.52±1.10)、(7.78±1.13)、(37.23±2.83)分,均高于A组的(6.57±0.74)、(6.21±0.80)、(6.37±0.90)、(6.72±0.93)、(6.62±0.97)、(32.51±2.05)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论以学生为中心、案例分析为核心,急救思路为主导的新型教学法有助于提高中医急诊的教学质量,同时受到学生欢迎。Objective:To explore the influence of traditional teaching method and student-centered,case-analysis and emergency thinking teaching method on the teaching effect of TCM emergency.Methods:A total of 60 students majoring in traditional Chinese Medicine from Hebei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine grade 2018 were randomly divided into groups A and B.The same teacher carried out different teaching modes for the four classes of"Syndrome of syncope""Syndrome of collapse""Sudden heartache"and"Heart failure"respectively.Group A accepted the traditional teaching mode for the above four classes,and group B accepted the new teaching method led by emergency thinking,with student-centered and case analysis as the core.After the class,a unified examination was conducted to check the students′learning of theoretical knowledge,and a questionnaire survey was issued to evaluate the teaching effect.Results:The average scores of the students in group B who received the new teaching method were(84.66±7.85),(85.06±8.11),(85.30±6.75),(84.23±7.20),respectively.The scores of students in group A receiving traditional teaching methods were(79.73±8.08),(79.23±8.28),(79.36±7.62),(77.76±7.95),and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).According to the questionnaire survey,the scores and total scores of learning interest,self-learning ability,teaching method satisfaction,whether they understand that diseases need attention,and clinical emergency thinking ability of the new teaching method in group B were as follows:(7.01±1.11)、(7.52±1.00)、(7.38±0.96)、(7.52±1.10)、(7.78±1.13)、(37.23±2.83),which were higher than(6.57±0.74)、(6.21±0.80)、(6.37±0.90)、(6.72±0.93)、(6.62±0.97)、(32.51±2.05)of the traditional teaching method in group A,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The student-centered teaching method with case analysis as the core and emergency thinking as the leading method is helpful to improve the teaching quality of TCM eme

关 键 词：中医急诊 急救思路 教学法 教学效果 

分 类 号：R278[医药卫生—中医学]