检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭鑫鑫 李倩茹 王海燕[3] 杜建国[1] GUO Xinxin;LI Qianru;WANG Haiyan;DU Jianguo(School of Management,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China;School of Economics and Management,Jiangsu University of Science and Technology,Zhenjiang 212100,China;School of Economics and Management,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]江苏科技大学经济管理学院,江苏镇江212100 [3]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏南京211189
出 处:《运筹与管理》2023年第11期170-175,I0069-I0076,共14页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(72201113,72071042);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2022M711377);江苏省高校自然科学面上项目(22KJB630004);江苏省高校哲学社科基金项目(2021SJA2096)。
摘 要:针对数据产品呈现双边价值不确定,数据交易平台单方面定价容易造成不公平,如何设定交易双方满意的价格成为推动数据交易平台健康发展的关键问题。通过分析数据交易平台与潜在数据需求者间的交易行为,结合数据产品的特征,构建数据交易双方的收益模型。考虑数据交易双方间存在需求信息不对称及利益冲突,依据机制设计理论和拍卖理论,通过设计拍卖机制来决策最优的数据交易价格。研究发现:拍卖定价机制的信息空间是关于数据交易价格连续单调递减的函数空间,结果函数是由数据需求者投标的需求函数和平台的最大供给量决定。最后,通过算例实验进一步验证了所设计的拍卖定价机制有效性。本文的研究结论可为进行所有权交易的数据产品的价格设定及交易量分配提供理论指导。At present,various data trading platforms in the market promote the market flow of data products,and also provide a place for potential data demanders to obtain data products or services.However,the price of data products is affected by a variety of subjective and objective factors,which makes it difficult to price data products in the way of traditional commodities.From the perspective of data seller,the same data product can be sold several times,so that it cannot be priced according to the transaction price equal to marginal cost.From the perspective of data buyers,the real value of data products can be defined only after use,and there is a certain value lag.In the face of the lack of historical experience in the pricing process of data products,exploring the pricing mechanism of data products has become the key to promoting the sustainable development of data trading platforms.Considering the existence of information asymmetry in data transactions,the pricing by data trading platforms can easily lead to unfairness.By analyzing the trading behavior between data trading platforms and potential data demanders,we consider the pricing problem of data transactions as a coordination problem under information asymmetry.In other words,for data products that cannot be traded repeatedly,how does the data trading platform coordinate the purchase volume of many potential data demanders to maximize social welfare?A challenge encountered in the coordination process is that the utility of the potential data demanders is private information,making it rather challenging for the data trading platform to achieve group objectives with incomplete information.In this paper,we formulate the coordination problem as a mechanism design problem.The data demanders are modeled as individual utility maximizers,while the group objective is encoded in the social choice function,which is to maximize the social welfare subject to a maximum supply constraint.We then design an auction mechanism to determine the optimal trading price of data prod
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.24.23